rs1917813
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_020549.5(CHAT):c.1511+153T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.382 in 151,402 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11,868 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020549.5 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- congenital myasthenic syndrome 6Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHAT | NM_020549.5 | c.1511+153T>C | intron_variant | Intron 10 of 14 | ENST00000337653.7 | NP_065574.4 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHAT | ENST00000337653.7 | c.1511+153T>C | intron_variant | Intron 10 of 14 | 1 | NM_020549.5 | ENSP00000337103.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.382 AC: 57755AN: 151298Hom.: 11868 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.382 AC: 57760AN: 151402Hom.: 11868 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.376 AC XY: 27774AN XY: 73934 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at