rs191840835

Variant names:

• chr3-38597840-C-T
• rs191840835
• NM_001099404.2:c.2151G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2 BP4_Strong BP6 BP7

The NM_000335.5(SCN5A):​c.2151G>A​(p.Pro717Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000595 in 1,614,002 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P717P) has been classified as Likely benign.

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000055 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: SCN5A NM_000335.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7 B:9
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -6.22

Genes affected

SCN5A (HGNC:10593): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 5) The protein encoded by this gene is an integral membrane protein and tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channel subunit. This protein is found primarily in cardiac muscle and is responsible for the initial upstroke of the action potential in an electrocardiogram. Defects in this gene have been associated with long QT syndrome type 3 (LQT3), atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, and Brugada syndrome 1, all autosomal dominant cardiac diseases. Alternative splicing results in several transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

• PM2: Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage
• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
• BP6: Variant 3-38597840-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38597840-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 345125.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=7}.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-6.22 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SCN5A	NM_001099404.2	c.2151G>A	p.Pro717Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 14 of 28	ENST00000413689.6	NP_001092874.1
SCN5A	NM_000335.5	c.2151G>A	p.Pro717Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 14 of 28	ENST00000423572.7	NP_000326.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SCN5A	ENST00000413689.6	c.2151G>A	p.Pro717Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 14 of 28	5	NM_001099404.2	ENSP00000410257.1
SCN5A	ENST00000423572.7	c.2151G>A	p.Pro717Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 14 of 28	1	NM_000335.5	ENSP00000398266.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000105 AC: 16 AN: 152182 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000265

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.000193

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000588

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000882 AC: 22 AN: 249294 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000104 AC XY: 14 AN XY: 135226

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000581

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.0000290

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.000278

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000619

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000547 AC: 80 AN: 1461702 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000550 AC XY: 40 AN XY: 727134

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000508

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.000302

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000405

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.0000331

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000105 AC: 16 AN: 152300 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000940 AC XY: 7 AN XY: 74460

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000265

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.000133 Hom.: 1

Bravo AF: 0.000136

EpiCase AF: 0.0000545

EpiControl AF: 0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:7 Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3

Aug 08, 2018

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

SCN5A: BP4, BP7 -

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Brugada syndrome 1 Uncertain:1 Benign:1

-

Roden Lab, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: in vitro;research

We classified this variant using data from the calibrated functional assay 'ParSE-seq' (PMID: 37732247), population data, and in silico data within the ACMG v3 framework (PMID: 25741868)The SCN5A variant, 3-38597840-C-T was evaluated for association with the loss-of-function condition Brugada Syndrome.This Variant had an AF of 0.000105137 in gnomAD v3The in silico predictor SpliceAI scored the variant as 0; normal <0.2, likely damaging >0.5.Using the functional RNA-splicing assay, ParSE-seq, the variant was evaluated to have no impact on splicing (BS3_strong) following the Brnich et al. calibration framework (PMID: 31892348). We do not apply benign splicing functional data to missense variants. In aggregate, we therefore classify this variant as LB using these collective data. -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Benign:2

Sep 03, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 14, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:2

Apr 15, 2019

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 13, 2023

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ventricular fibrillation, paroxysmal familial, type 1 Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1E Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Sick sinus syndrome 1 Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Congenital long QT syndrome Uncertain:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Progressive familial heart block, type 1A Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Long QT syndrome 3 Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1

Sep 04, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.85
CADD	Benign	0.26
DANN	Benign	0.49

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs191840835; hg19: chr3-38639331; COSMIC: COSV61133977;