rs191913664

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_015102.5(NPHP4):​c.2203C>T​(p.Arg735Trp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000343 in 1,589,512 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R735P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00087 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00029 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NPHP4
NM_015102.5 missense

Scores

1
11
7

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:10B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.72
Variant links:
Genes affected
NPHP4 (HGNC:19104): (nephrocystin 4) This gene encodes a protein involved in renal tubular development and function. This protein interacts with nephrocystin, and belongs to a multifunctional complex that is localized to actin- and microtubule-based structures. Mutations in this gene are associated with nephronophthisis type 4, a renal disease, and with Senior-Loken syndrome type 4, a combination of nephronophthisis and retinitis pigmentosa. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.07159203).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000873 (133/152272) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00301 (46/15302). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00232. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 63 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NPHP4NM_015102.5 linkc.2203C>T p.Arg735Trp missense_variant Exon 17 of 30 ENST00000378156.9 NP_055917.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NPHP4ENST00000378156.9 linkc.2203C>T p.Arg735Trp missense_variant Exon 17 of 30 1 NM_015102.5 ENSP00000367398.4 O75161-1
NPHP4ENST00000378169.7 linkn.*1104C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 14 of 27 1 ENSP00000367411.3 D6RA06
NPHP4ENST00000489180.6 linkn.2200C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 17 of 33 2 ENSP00000423747.1 O75161-2
NPHP4ENST00000378169.7 linkn.*1104C>T 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 14 of 27 1 ENSP00000367411.3 D6RA06

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000874
AC:
133
AN:
152154
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00171
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00301
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000191
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000955
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000400
AC:
95
AN:
237702
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000348
AC XY:
45
AN XY:
129406
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00218
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000986
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000342
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000477
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000243
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000515
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000287
AC:
412
AN:
1437240
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000298
AC XY:
212
AN XY:
710732
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00233
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000958
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000256
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000710
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000381
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000224
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000456
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000873
AC:
133
AN:
152272
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000846
AC XY:
63
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00171
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00301
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000191
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000945
Alfa
AF:
0.000318
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00116
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00178
AC:
7
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000315
AC:
38

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:10Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:5
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 05, 2022
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 10, 2018
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 05, 2022
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Identified in individuals with nephronophthisis in published literature, although a second NPHP4 variant was not reported for one individual and the other individual had variants in a different gene that may have also contributed to the phenotype (Hoefele et al., 2005; Davis et al., 2011); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15776426, 21258341, 34426522, 32865313, 32483926) -

Nephronophthisis 4 Uncertain:2
May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

NPHP4-related disorder Uncertain:1
May 01, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

The NPHP4 c.2203C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg735Trp. This variant along with two other NPHP4 variants (c.2951C>T, p.Thr984Met and c.2965G>A, p.Glu989Lys) were reported in an individual with Senior–Løken syndrome (Sallum et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 32865313). This variant was also found in the heterozygous state or along with the c.2965G>A, p.Glu989Lys in individuals with nephronophthisis (Hoefele et al. 2005. PubMed ID: 15776426; Tables S2 and S3, König et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 36090483). This variant was also documented in an individual from a retinal dystrophy cohort (Table S12, Diñeiro et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 32483926). This variant is reported in 0.21% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD. Although we suspect that this variant may possibly be benign, at this time its clinical significance is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Senior-Loken syndrome 4 Uncertain:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Senior-Loken syndrome 4;C1847013:Nephronophthisis 4 Uncertain:1
Dec 30, 2023
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.091
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.12
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.050
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.39
T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.39
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.41
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.95
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.94
D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.14
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.072
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.44
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.5
L;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.22
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.0
D;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.53
Sift
Uncertain
0.0090
D;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.016
D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;.
Vest4
0.57
MVP
0.95
MPC
0.33
ClinPred
0.055
T
GERP RS
5.6
Varity_R
0.15
gMVP
0.36

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.090
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs191913664; hg19: chr1-5951029; API