rs192376005

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001384474.1(LOXHD1):c.1570C>T(p.Arg524Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00305 in 1,552,186 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0031 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

LOXHD1
NM_001384474.1 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.27

Variant links:

Genes affected

LOXHD1 (HGNC:26521): (lipoxygenase homology PLAT domains 1) This gene encodes a highly conserved protein consisting entirely of PLAT (polycystin/lipoxygenase/alpha-toxin) domains, thought to be involved in targeting proteins to the plasma membrane. Studies in mice show that this gene is expressed in the mechanosensory hair cells in the inner ear, and mutations in this gene lead to auditory defects, indicating that this gene is essential for normal hair cell function. Screening of human families segregating deafness identified a mutation in this gene which causes DFNB77, a progressive form of autosomal-recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss (ARNSHL). Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

LOXHD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.024916917).

BP6

Variant 18-46592017-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-46592017-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 163930.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=4}. Variant chr18-46592017-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00282 (430/152276) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00883 (135/15296). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00761. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 214 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LOXHD1	NM_001384474.1 link	c.1570C>T	p.Arg524Cys	missense_variant	Exon 12 of 41	ENST00000642948.1	NP_001371403.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LOXHD1	ENST00000642948.1 link	c.1570C>T	p.Arg524Cys	missense_variant	Exon 12 of 41		NM_001384474.1	ENSP00000496347.1	A0A2R8Y7K4
LOXHD1	ENST00000536736.5 link	c.1570C>T	p.Arg524Cys	missense_variant	Exon 12 of 40	5		ENSP00000444586.1	F5GZB4
LOXHD1	ENST00000441551.6 link	c.1570C>T	p.Arg524Cys	missense_variant	Exon 12 of 39	5		ENSP00000387621.2	Q8IVV2-1
LOXHD1	ENST00000335730.6 link	n.883C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 5 of 27	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00283

AC:

431

AN:

152158

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000700

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00890

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00173

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00370

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00335

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00274

AC:

440

AN:

160600

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00254

AC XY:

214

AN XY:

84096

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000769

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00435

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00538

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000883

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000263

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000409

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00398

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00371

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00308

AC:

4306

AN:

1399910

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00291

AC XY:

2012

AN XY:

690436

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000601

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00420

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00401

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000560

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000341

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000323

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00354

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00284

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00282

AC:

430

AN:

152276

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00287

AC XY:

214

AN XY:

74448

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000698

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00883

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00173

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00370

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00331

Alfa

AF:

0.00346

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00312

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00378

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00311

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000723

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00314

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00168

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:4

Jun 12, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jan 20, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 25, 2017

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 24, 2020

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

LOXHD1: BS2 -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 77

Uncertain:3Benign:1

Mar 06, 2017

Counsyl

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 08, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 30, 2015

Division of Human Genetics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:3

May 18, 2017

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Arg524Cys in exon 12 of LOXHD1: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 0.5% (44/8578) of Ashkenazi Jewis h chromosomes and 0.4% (291/73944) of European chromosomes including 1 homozygot e by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbS NP rs192376005}. This variant has also been reported in seven members of one fam ily with autosomal dominant, late onset Fuchs corneal dystrophy (FCD); however, one affected family member did not carry this variant and functional studies wer e not strongly supportive of pathogenicity (Riazzudin 2012). In summary, this va riant is benign based on its frequency in the general population and the evidenc e against an association with FCD, primarily the non-segregation. -

Oct 30, 2015

Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 26, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 23, 2022

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: LOXHD1 c.1570C>T (p.Arg524Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0027 in 160600 control chromosomes including one homozygote (gnomAD), predominantly at a frequency of 0.0044 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Latino control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 4 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in LOXHD1 causing Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss And Deafness, Type 77 phenotype (0.0011), suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Latino origin. c.1570C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss And Deafness, Type 77 (Sheppard_2018), however this report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss And Deafness, Type 77. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eleven ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: five have classified the variant as of uncertain significance, five as likely benign, and one as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

LOXHD1-related disorder

Benign:1

Jul 31, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.55

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.0054

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.22

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.97

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.96

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Pathogenic

0.98

D;D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.13

MetaRNN

Benign

0.025

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.021

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.64

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-6.5

D;.;.

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.66

Sift

Benign

0.17

T;.;.

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;.;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;.;.

Vest4

0.78

MVP

0.72

ClinPred

0.026

GERP RS

6.1

Varity_R

0.43

gMVP

0.75

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over