Menu
GeneBe

rs192490028

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_177438.3(DICER1):c.1377-4T>G variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00328 in 1,613,702 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/2 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0025 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0034 ( 20 hom. )

Consequence

DICER1
NM_177438.3 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0004324
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.705
Variant links:
Genes affected
DICER1 (HGNC:17098): (dicer 1, ribonuclease III) This gene encodes a protein possessing an RNA helicase motif containing a DEXH box in its amino terminus and an RNA motif in the carboxy terminus. The encoded protein functions as a ribonuclease and is required by the RNA interference and small temporal RNA (stRNA) pathways to produce the active small RNA component that represses gene expression. This protein also acts as a strong antiviral agent with activity against RNA viruses, including the Zika and SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2021]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.59).
BP6
Variant 14-95117758-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-95117758-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 220838.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-95117758-A-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr14-95117758-A-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00253 (386/152292) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0035 (238/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00313. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 175 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 387 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DICER1NM_177438.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1377-4T>G splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant ENST00000343455.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DICER1ENST00000343455.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1377-4T>G splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_177438.3 P1Q9UPY3-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00254
AC:
387
AN:
152174
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00268
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00290
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000848
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00350
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00717
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00343
AC:
860
AN:
251062
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00357
AC XY:
485
AN XY:
135718
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000492
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00556
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00402
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000416
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00348
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00425
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00336
AC:
4911
AN:
1461410
Hom.:
20
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00337
AC XY:
2450
AN XY:
727012
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000538
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00537
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00424
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000562
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00325
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00432
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00253
AC:
386
AN:
152292
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00235
AC XY:
175
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000481
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00268
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00311
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000848
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00350
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00710
Alfa
AF:
0.00314
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00233
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
8
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00551
EpiControl
AF:
0.00474

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationFoulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical ResearchJul 01, 2019ACMG criteria met: BS1, BP4 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 03, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoMay 20, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 13, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoMay 23, 2016- -
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenFeb 01, 2024DICER1: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 21, 2022- -
DICER1-related tumor predisposition Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Euthyroid goiter;C1266144:Pleuropulmonary blastoma;C1867234:Rhabdomyosarcoma, embryonal, 2;C4748924:Global developmental delay - lung cysts - overgrowth - Wilms tumor syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsApr 22, 2022- -
Pleuropulmonary blastoma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 30, 2017This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.59
Cadd
Benign
6.0
Dann
Benign
0.72
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00043
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.046
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs192490028; hg19: chr14-95584095; COSMIC: COSV100601906; API