rs192570479

Positions:

chr17-18127132-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS2

The NM_016239.4(MYO15A):c.3999C>T(p.Ala1333=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000351 in 1,614,040 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00061 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00032 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

MYO15A
NM_016239.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.917

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYO15A (HGNC:7594): (myosin XVA) This gene encodes an unconventional myosin. This protein differs from other myosins in that it has a long N-terminal extension preceding the conserved motor domain. Studies in mice suggest that this protein is necessary for actin organization in the hair cells of the cochlea. Mutations in this gene have been associated with profound, congenital, neurosensory, nonsyndromal deafness. This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. Read-through transcripts containing an upstream gene and this gene have been identified, but they are not thought to encode a fusion protein. Several alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described, but their full length sequences have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

MYO15A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.29).

BP6

Variant 17-18127132-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-18127132-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 226786.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.917 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYO15A	NM_016239.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.3999C>T	p.Ala1333=	synonymous_variant	7/66	ENST00000647165.2	NP_057323.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MYO15A	ENST00000647165.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.3999C>T	p.Ala1333=	synonymous_variant	7/66		NM_016239.4	ENSP00000495481	P1	Q9UKN7-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000618

AC:

AN:

152110

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00164

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00889

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00311

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000898

AC:

224

AN:

249356

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000938

AC XY:

127

AN XY:

135330

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000646

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000580

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0105

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000719

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000177

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00149

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000324

AC:

474

AN:

1461812

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000336

AC XY:

244

AN XY:

727200

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000447

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00549

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000800

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000351

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00242

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000611

AC:

AN:

152228

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000564

AC XY:

AN XY:

74424

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00163

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00891

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00290

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00237

Alfa

AF:

0.000201

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000446

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0180

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Oct 20, 2016	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	May 05, 2015	Ala1333Ala in Exon 07 of MYO15A: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located with in the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.9% (78/8602) of E ast Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.bro adinstitute.org; dbSNP rs192570479). -

not provided

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Mar 29, 2019	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 31, 2024	- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 3

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.29

CADD

Benign

6.9

DANN

Benign

0.80

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over