rs193224180
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2_Supporting
The NM_001164507.2(NEB):c.23776C>T(p.Pro7926Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00181 in 1,612,560 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164507.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001164507.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEB | NM_001164507.2 | MANE Plus Clinical | c.23776C>T | p.Pro7926Ser | missense | Exon 166 of 182 | NP_001157979.2 | ||
| NEB | NM_001164508.2 | MANE Select | c.23776C>T | p.Pro7926Ser | missense | Exon 166 of 182 | NP_001157980.2 | ||
| NEB | NM_001271208.2 | c.23881C>T | p.Pro7961Ser | missense | Exon 167 of 183 | NP_001258137.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.23776C>T | p.Pro7926Ser | missense | Exon 166 of 182 | ENSP00000380505.3 | ||
| NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | TSL:5 MANE Plus Clinical | c.23776C>T | p.Pro7926Ser | missense | Exon 166 of 182 | ENSP00000416578.2 | ||
| NEB | ENST00000409198.5 | TSL:5 | c.18673C>T | p.Pro6225Ser | missense | Exon 139 of 150 | ENSP00000386259.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00135 AC: 205AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00110 AC: 274AN: 248950 AF XY: 0.00107 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00186 AC: 2719AN: 1460298Hom.: 6 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00173 AC XY: 1260AN XY: 726472 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00135 AC: 205AN: 152262Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00124 AC XY: 92AN XY: 74446 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:4Benign:1
The NEB p.Pro7926Ser variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs193224180), ClinVar (classified as likely benign by EGL Genetics and as a VUS by Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine and Invitae for nemaline myopathy 2) and LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in control databases in 316 of 280356 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.001127 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 260 of 128302 chromosomes (freq: 0.002026), Latino in 38 of 35298 chromosomes (freq: 0.001077), Other in 6 of 7122 chromosomes (freq: 0.000843), African in 8 of 24192 chromosomes (freq: 0.000331), European (Finnish) in 3 of 25010 chromosomes (freq: 0.00012) and Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 10348 chromosomes (freq: 0.000097); it was not observed in the East Asian and South Asian populations. The p.Pro7926 residue is conserved across mammals and other organisms, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 3 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance.
Reported previously in a child with congenital cataracts, ptosis, hypotonia, delay in motor skills, dysphagia, and respiratory failure, who has variants in multiple other genes (PMID: 32420686); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32420686)
NEB: BS1
Nemaline myopathy 2 Uncertain:2Benign:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Pro7961Ser va riant in NEB has not been previously reported in individuals with myopathy, but has been identified in 0.15% (97/66646) of European chromosomes by the Exome Agg regation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs193224180). C omputational prediction tools and conservation analysis do not provide strong su pport for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, while the clinical si gnificance of the p.Pro7961Ser variant is uncertain, these data suggest that it is more likely to be benign.
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The c.18673C>T (p.P6225S) alteration is located in exon 139 (coding exon 137) of the NEB gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 18673, causing the proline (P) at amino acid position 6225 to be replaced by a serine (S). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.
NEB-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at