rs193224180

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2_Supporting

The NM_001164507.2(NEB):​c.23776C>T​(p.Pro7926Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00181 in 1,612,560 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0019 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

NEB
NM_001164507.2 missense

Scores

8
10

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.94

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NEB (HGNC:7720): (nebulin) This gene encodes nebulin, a giant protein component of the cytoskeletal matrix that coexists with the thick and thin filaments within the sarcomeres of skeletal muscle. In most vertebrates, nebulin accounts for 3 to 4% of the total myofibrillar protein. The encoded protein contains approximately 30-amino acid long modules that can be classified into 7 types and other repeated modules. Protein isoform sizes vary from 600 to 800 kD due to alternative splicing that is tissue-, species-,and developmental stage-specific. Of the 183 exons in the nebulin gene, at least 43 are alternatively spliced, although exons 143 and 144 are not found in the same transcript. Of the several thousand transcript variants predicted for nebulin, the RefSeq Project has decided to create three representative RefSeq records. Mutations in this gene are associated with recessive nemaline myopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
RIF1 (HGNC:23207): (replication timing regulatory factor 1) This gene encodes a protein that shares homology with the yeast teleomere binding protein, Rap1 interacting factor 1. This protein localizes to aberrant telomeres may be involved in DNA repair. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.021578938).
BP6
Variant 2-151503408-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-151503408-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 194312.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00135 (205/152262) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00256 (174/68010). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00225. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 92 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AD,AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001164507.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
NEB
NM_001164507.2
MANE Plus Clinical
c.23776C>Tp.Pro7926Ser
missense
Exon 166 of 182NP_001157979.2
NEB
NM_001164508.2
MANE Select
c.23776C>Tp.Pro7926Ser
missense
Exon 166 of 182NP_001157980.2
NEB
NM_001271208.2
c.23881C>Tp.Pro7961Ser
missense
Exon 167 of 183NP_001258137.2

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
NEB
ENST00000397345.8
TSL:5 MANE Select
c.23776C>Tp.Pro7926Ser
missense
Exon 166 of 182ENSP00000380505.3
NEB
ENST00000427231.7
TSL:5 MANE Plus Clinical
c.23776C>Tp.Pro7926Ser
missense
Exon 166 of 182ENSP00000416578.2
NEB
ENST00000409198.5
TSL:5
c.18673C>Tp.Pro6225Ser
missense
Exon 139 of 150ENSP00000386259.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00135
AC:
205
AN:
152144
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000314
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000283
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00256
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00192
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00110
AC:
274
AN:
248950
AF XY:
0.00107
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000323
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000994
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00198
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000663
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00186
AC:
2719
AN:
1460298
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.00173
AC XY:
1260
AN XY:
726472
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000389
AC:
13
AN:
33428
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00112
AC:
50
AN:
44704
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26110
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39648
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86172
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000112
AC:
6
AN:
53384
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5744
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00228
AC:
2532
AN:
1110780
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00194
AC:
117
AN:
60328
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.453
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
114
228
342
456
570
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
104
208
312
416
520
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00135
AC:
205
AN:
152262
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00124
AC XY:
92
AN XY:
74446
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000313
AC:
13
AN:
41568
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000654
AC:
10
AN:
15284
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000288
AC:
1
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000283
AC:
3
AN:
10600
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00256
AC:
174
AN:
68010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00190
AC:
4
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12
23
35
46
58
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00175
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00128
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00162
AC:
6
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00259
AC:
10
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000546
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00293
AC:
24
ExAC
AF:
0.000952
AC:
115

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:4Benign:1
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The NEB p.Pro7926Ser variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs193224180), ClinVar (classified as likely benign by EGL Genetics and as a VUS by Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine and Invitae for nemaline myopathy 2) and LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in control databases in 316 of 280356 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.001127 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 260 of 128302 chromosomes (freq: 0.002026), Latino in 38 of 35298 chromosomes (freq: 0.001077), Other in 6 of 7122 chromosomes (freq: 0.000843), African in 8 of 24192 chromosomes (freq: 0.000331), European (Finnish) in 3 of 25010 chromosomes (freq: 0.00012) and Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 10348 chromosomes (freq: 0.000097); it was not observed in the East Asian and South Asian populations. The p.Pro7926 residue is conserved across mammals and other organisms, and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 3 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance.

Dec 06, 2021
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 08, 2025
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Reported previously in a child with congenital cataracts, ptosis, hypotonia, delay in motor skills, dysphagia, and respiratory failure, who has variants in multiple other genes (PMID: 32420686); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32420686)

Oct 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

NEB: BS1

May 15, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nemaline myopathy 2 Uncertain:2Benign:1
Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance.

Nov 11, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Mar 23, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 03, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Pro7961Ser va riant in NEB has not been previously reported in individuals with myopathy, but has been identified in 0.15% (97/66646) of European chromosomes by the Exome Agg regation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs193224180). C omputational prediction tools and conservation analysis do not provide strong su pport for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, while the clinical si gnificance of the p.Pro7961Ser variant is uncertain, these data suggest that it is more likely to be benign.

Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
May 11, 2022
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The c.18673C>T (p.P6225S) alteration is located in exon 139 (coding exon 137) of the NEB gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 18673, causing the proline (P) at amino acid position 6225 to be replaced by a serine (S). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.

NEB-related disorder Benign:1
Sep 23, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.15
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.41
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.36
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.075
T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.43
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.49
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.91
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.75
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.017
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.022
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.41
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.2
M
PhyloP100
3.9
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.69
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.5
D
REVEL
Benign
0.13
Sift
Benign
0.32
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.016
D
Polyphen
0.20
B
Vest4
0.63
MVP
0.38
MPC
0.33
ClinPred
0.051
T
GERP RS
5.4
Varity_R
0.21
gMVP
0.31
Mutation Taster
=245/55
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs193224180; hg19: chr2-152359922; API