rs193302860
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 4P and 2B. PM1PM2BP4BS1_Supporting
The NM_032520.5(GNPTG):c.857C>T(p.Thr286Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00014 in 1,614,028 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032520.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNPTG | NM_032520.5 | c.857C>T | p.Thr286Met | missense_variant | 11/11 | ENST00000204679.9 | NP_115909.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNPTG | ENST00000204679.9 | c.857C>T | p.Thr286Met | missense_variant | 11/11 | 1 | NM_032520.5 | ENSP00000204679.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000388 AC: 59AN: 152086Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000195 AC: 49AN: 251280Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000199 AC XY: 27AN XY: 135828
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000114 AC: 166AN: 1461824Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000124 AC XY: 90AN XY: 727214
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000394 AC: 60AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000417 AC XY: 31AN XY: 74404
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
GNPTG-mucolipidosis Uncertain:3Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Nov 07, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | GeneReviews | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Apr 27, 2017 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Sep 06, 2022 | This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 286 of the GNPTG protein (p.Thr286Met). This variant is present in population databases (rs193302860, gnomAD 0.06%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with Mucolipidosis III Gamma (PMID: 19370764, 24767253). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 21724). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The methionine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect GNPTG function (PMID: 27038293). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Oct 16, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at