rs193922705

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_002230.4(JUP):​c.909+6C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00129 in 1,613,530 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 2 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 16 hom. )

Consequence

JUP
NM_002230.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00002116
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.142

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
JUP (HGNC:6207): (junction plakoglobin) This gene encodes a major cytoplasmic protein which is the only known constituent common to submembranous plaques of both desmosomes and intermediate junctions. This protein forms distinct complexes with cadherins and desmosomal cadherins and is a member of the catenin family since it contains a distinct repeating amino acid motif called the armadillo repeat. Mutation in this gene has been associated with Naxos disease. Alternative splicing occurs in this gene; however, not all transcripts have been fully described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
JUP Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • inherited epidermolysis bullosa
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • Naxos disease
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • lethal acantholytic epidermolysis bullosa
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).
BP6
Variant 17-41767373-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-41767373-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 36426.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00119 (181/152336) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00111 (17/15306). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000707. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 78 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
JUPNM_002230.4 linkc.909+6C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 5 of 13 ENST00000393931.8 NP_002221.1 P14923A0A0S2Z487

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
JUPENST00000393931.8 linkc.909+6C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 5 of 13 1 NM_002230.4 ENSP00000377508.3 P14923

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00119
AC:
181
AN:
152218
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0271
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000838
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00207
AC:
520
AN:
250980
AF XY:
0.00209
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000308
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000723
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0277
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00130
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00571
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00130
AC:
1893
AN:
1461194
Hom.:
16
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
0.00134
AC XY:
977
AN XY:
726900
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000418
AC:
14
AN:
33466
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000604
AC:
27
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0280
AC:
732
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000742
AC:
64
AN:
86240
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53212
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0219
AC:
125
AN:
5720
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000649
AC:
722
AN:
1111642
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00346
AC:
209
AN:
60364
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.486
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
112
224
337
449
561
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
38
76
114
152
190
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00119
AC:
181
AN:
152336
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00105
AC XY:
78
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000144
AC:
6
AN:
41570
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00111
AC:
17
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0271
AC:
94
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0136
AC:
4
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000838
AC:
57
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
10
21
31
42
52
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00326
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00130
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00224
EpiControl
AF:
0.00231

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

May 14, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

c.909+6C>T in exon 5 of JUP: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it has been identified in 0.3% (184/66606) of European chromosom es, including 2 homozygous occurrences, by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExA C, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs193922705). -

Jan 14, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:5
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

JUP: BP4, BS2 -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 16, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Naxos disease Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Mar 25, 2019
Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Nov 13, 2019
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:1
Mar 25, 2015
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Naxos disease;C1969081:Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12 Benign:1
Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.75
CADD
Benign
3.6
DANN
Benign
0.81
PhyloP100
-0.14
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Mutation Taster
=96/4
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000021
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0020
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs193922705; hg19: chr17-39923625; API