Menu
GeneBe

rs199473044

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 7P and 1B. PM1PM2PM5PP2BP4

The NM_001099404.2(SCN5A):c.52C>T(p.Arg18Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000159 in 1,612,938 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R18Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000092 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00017 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SCN5A
NM_001099404.2 missense

Scores

4
9
5

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:9B:6O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.50
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN5A (HGNC:10593): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 5) The protein encoded by this gene is an integral membrane protein and tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-gated sodium channel subunit. This protein is found primarily in cardiac muscle and is responsible for the initial upstroke of the action potential in an electrocardiogram. Defects in this gene have been associated with long QT syndrome type 3 (LQT3), atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, and Brugada syndrome 1, all autosomal dominant cardiac diseases. Alternative splicing results in several transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.

PM1
In a topological_domain Cytoplasmic (size 130) in uniprot entity SCN5A_HUMAN there are 24 pathogenic changes around while only 8 benign (75%) in NM_001099404.2
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr3-38633255-C-T is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, SCN5A
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.38248214).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SCN5ANM_001099404.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.52C>T p.Arg18Trp missense_variant 2/28 ENST00000413689.6
SCN5ANM_000335.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.52C>T p.Arg18Trp missense_variant 2/28 ENST00000423572.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SCN5AENST00000413689.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.52C>T p.Arg18Trp missense_variant 2/285 NM_001099404.2 P4
SCN5AENST00000423572.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.52C>T p.Arg18Trp missense_variant 2/281 NM_000335.5 A1Q14524-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000920
AC:
14
AN:
152184
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000270
AC:
67
AN:
248478
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000378
AC XY:
51
AN XY:
134928
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000106
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000331
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000166
AC:
243
AN:
1460636
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000228
AC XY:
166
AN XY:
726658
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000896
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00158
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000191
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000765
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000199
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000919
AC:
14
AN:
152302
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000134
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000481
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00125
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000147
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000718
ExAC
AF:
0.000331
AC:
40
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:6Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 17, 2024- -
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyCardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust-This variant has been reported in the following publications (PMID:15840476;PMID:19841300;PMID:20129283). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 27, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32048431, 28988457, 28600387, 25904541, 20129283, 15840476, 25351510, 19862833, 23805106, 29728395) -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingStanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford UniversityJul 18, 2011Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. p.Arg18Trp (c.52C>T) in the SCN5A gene Given the frequency in ancestry-matched unselected individuals and the very weak case data we consider this variant to be likely benign and we do not feel it is suitable for assessing risk in healthy relatives ("predictive genetic testing"). Tester et al (2005) observed the variant in 1 of 541 cases. This publication is a compendium of variants identified in cases referred to Dr. Ackerman's research lab for long QT genetic testing. No individual clinical or segregation data was provided. Of note when considering this paper, it is likely that ~25% of patients in this cohort did not actually have long QT syndrome (based on the reported yield). The variant was reported online in 39 of 59,815 individuals in the Exome Aggregation Consortium dataset (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/), which currently includes variant calls on ~64,000 individuals of European, African, Latino and Asian descent (as of July 21, 2015). The highest frequency was in 32 of 8254. The phenotype of those individuals is not publicly available. The dataset is comprised of multiple cohorts, some of which were recruited from the general population, others were enriched for common cardiovascular disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 25, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 0.2% (32/16508) South Asian -
Brugada syndrome 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMay 08, 2019This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsAug 22, 2023- -
Ventricular fibrillation, paroxysmal familial, type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMay 08, 2019This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1E Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMay 08, 2019This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart InstituteJul 18, 2017- -
Sick sinus syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMay 08, 2019This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Progressive familial heart block, type 1A Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMay 08, 2019This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBlueprint GeneticsOct 14, 2014- -
Long QT syndrome 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMay 08, 2019This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 27, 2021This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthOct 20, 2018- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
CardioboostArm
Uncertain
0.13
CardioboostCm
Benign
0.040
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.056
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.13
Cadd
Benign
22
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.63
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.58
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.64
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.38
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.61
D
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.55
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.6
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;.;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.84
Sift
Uncertain
0.0070
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.059
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;D;.
Polyphen
0.99
D;D;.;D;.;D;D;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.81
MVP
0.92
MPC
1.1
ClinPred
0.49
T
GERP RS
4.4
Varity_R
0.26
gMVP
0.64

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs199473044; hg19: chr3-38674747; COSMIC: COSV60066899; COSMIC: COSV60066899; API