rs199473082
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5
The NM_001099404.2(SCN5A):c.844C>T(p.Arg282Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,634 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R282H) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001099404.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Brugada syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- Brugada syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- dilated cardiomyopathyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- dilated cardiomyopathy 1EInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- familial long QT syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- long QT syndrome 3Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- sick sinus syndrome 1Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- progressive familial heart block, type 1AInheritance: SD, AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
- atrial standstillInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial atrial fibrillationInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial sick sinus syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- paroxysmal familial ventricular fibrillationInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- progressive familial heart blockInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathyInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
- catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardiaInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- short QT syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461634Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727114 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:3
The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 68047). This missense change has been observed in individuals with Brugada syndrome (PMID: 20129283, 32533946; Invitae). This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 282 of the SCN5A protein (p.Arg282Cys). In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic. This variant disrupts the p.Arg282 amino acid residue in SCN5A. Other variant(s) that disrupt this residue have been determined to be pathogenic (PMID: 11901046, 15828879, 20129283). This suggests that this residue is clinically significant, and that variants that disrupt this residue are likely to be disease-causing. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects SCN5A function (PMID: 32533946). Advanced modeling performed at Invitae incorporating data from internal and/or published experimental studies (PMID: 32533946) indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt SCN5A function. -
Published functional studies suggest a damaging effect through reduced peak current (Glazer et al., 2020; O'Neill et al., 2022); Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26834636, 23874304, 20129283, 30662450, 22581653, 30203441, 35305865, 33786307, 32533946) -
The SCN5A c.844C>T; p.Arg282Cys variant (rs199473082) is reported in the literature in several individuals affected with Brugada syndrome (Glazer 2020, Kapplinger 2010, Kapplinger 2015). This variant is also reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 68047), but is absent from the Genome Aggregation Database, indicating it is not a common polymorphism. Computational analyses predict that this variant is deleterious (REVEL: 0.914), and functional analyses demonstrate a significant effect on protein function (Glazer 2020, O'Neill 2022). Additionally, another variant at this codon (c.845G>A; p.Arg282His) has been reported in individuals with Brugada syndrome and is considered pathogenic (Itoh 2005, Kapplinger 2015, O'Neill 2022). Based on available information, this variant is considered to be pathogenic. References: Glazer AM et al. High-Throughput Reclassification of SCN5A Variants. Am J Hum Genet. 2020 Jul 2;107(1):111-123. PMID: 32533946. Itoh H et . Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of Brugada syndrome caused by a missense mutation in the S5-pore site of SCN5A. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Apr;16(4):378-83. PMID: 15828879. Kapplinger JD et al. An international compendium of mutations in the SCN5A-encoded cardiac sodium channel in patients referred for Brugada syndrome genetic testing. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Jan;7(1):33-46. PMID: 20129283. Kapplinger JD et al. Enhanced Classification of Brugada Syndrome-Associated and Long-QT Syndrome-Associated Genetic Variants in the SCN5A-Encoded Na(v)1.5 Cardiac Sodium Channel. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2015 Aug;8(4):582-95. PMID: 25904541. O'Neill MJ et al. Dominant negative effects of SCN5A missense variants. Genet Med. 2022 Jun;24(6):1238-1248. PMID: 35305865. -
Brugada syndrome 1 Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
This variant is interpreted as a Uncertain Significance - Insufficient Evidence, for Brugada syndrome 1, in Autosomal Dominant manner. The following ACMG Tag(s) were applied: PM2 => Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive) in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes Project, or Exome Aggregation Consortium. PP3 => Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product. -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: The SCN5A c.844C>T (p.Arg282Cys) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide and is located in the ion transport domain (InterPro). 5/5 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 1/33556 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0000298, which does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic SCN5A variant (0.0001667). This variant has been reported in at least one BrS patient. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have classified this variant as likely pathogenic. Variant involving the same codon R282H (c.845G>A) has also been reported in BrS-affected individuals suggesting the functional importance of this codon. Taken together, this variant is classified as VUS-possibly pathogenic. -
Cardiac arrhythmia Uncertain:1
- -
Brugada syndrome Other:1
This variant has been reported as associated with Brugada syndrome in the following publications (PMID:20129283). This is a literature report, and does not necessarily reflect the clinical interpretation of the Imperial College / Royal Brompton Cardiovascular Genetics laboratory. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at