rs199473243
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_Strong
The NM_001099404.2(SCN5A):c.4259G>T(p.Gly1420Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as not provided (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G1420R) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001099404.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN5A | NM_001099404.2 | c.4259G>T | p.Gly1420Val | missense_variant | 24/28 | ENST00000413689.6 | NP_001092874.1 | |
SCN5A | NM_000335.5 | c.4256G>T | p.Gly1419Val | missense_variant | 24/28 | ENST00000423572.7 | NP_000326.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN5A | ENST00000413689.6 | c.4259G>T | p.Gly1420Val | missense_variant | 24/28 | 5 | NM_001099404.2 | ENSP00000410257 | P4 | |
SCN5A | ENST00000423572.7 | c.4256G>T | p.Gly1419Val | missense_variant | 24/28 | 1 | NM_000335.5 | ENSP00000398266 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Brugada syndrome Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust | - | This variant has been reported as associated with Brugada syndrome in the following publications (PMID:21126620). This is a literature report, and does not necessarily reflect the clinical interpretation of the Imperial College / Royal Brompton Cardiovascular Genetics laboratory. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at