Menu
GeneBe

rs199473505

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2

The NM_000238.4(KCNH2):c.982C>T(p.Arg328Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000435 in 1,614,188 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R328H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00061 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00042 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

KCNH2
NM_000238.4 missense

Scores

8
8
4

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:8O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.28
Variant links:
Genes affected
KCNH2 (HGNC:6251): (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2) This gene encodes a component of a voltage-activated potassium channel found in cardiac muscle, nerve cells, and microglia. Four copies of this protein interact with one copy of the KCNE2 protein to form a functional potassium channel. Mutations in this gene can cause long QT syndrome type 2 (LQT2). Transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0545232).
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 93 AD,Digenic gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
KCNH2NM_000238.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.982C>T p.Arg328Cys missense_variant 5/15 ENST00000262186.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
KCNH2ENST00000262186.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.982C>T p.Arg328Cys missense_variant 5/151 NM_000238.4 P1Q12809-1
KCNH2ENST00000532957.5 linkuse as main transcriptn.1205C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 5/92
KCNH2ENST00000684241.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1815C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 3/13

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000611
AC:
93
AN:
152264
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00555
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000176
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000570
AC:
143
AN:
250832
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000560
AC XY:
76
AN XY:
135796
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000617
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000579
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00453
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000309
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000817
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000417
AC:
609
AN:
1461806
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000388
AC XY:
282
AN XY:
727212
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000179
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000696
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00412
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000317
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000610
AC:
93
AN:
152382
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000859
AC XY:
64
AN XY:
74512
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000481
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00555
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000176
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.000242
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000434
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.000527
AC:
64
EpiCase
AF:
0.000382
EpiControl
AF:
0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:8Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2Other:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedprovider interpretationStanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford UniversityNov 15, 2016Given the weak case data and presence in population controls, we consider this variant likely benign. One possibility is that this variant contributes to an arrhythmic phenotype, perhaps behaving as a modifier, but not be the primary driver. This is based on the fact that several of the reported cases involved either a more convincing pathogenic variant or QT-prolonging medication, several other reported cases are from cohorts that include individuals who do not have long QT, and the variant is present in individuals not selected for a long QT phenotype, with ~1% of one such cohort having the variant. This is a previously reported variant in the N-terminal region. To date, the reported cases include - drug-induced long QT, complete AV block and Torsades: 2 - patients referred for long QT genetic testing, 25-50% likely don't have long QT: 6 - patients with long QT, all major genes analyzed with no other variants: 4 - patients with long QT and another, high confidence variant: 1 - patient with prolonged QT in the setting of evidence of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and a PKP2 frameshift variant: 1 Comparing frequencies: - 4/2500 in Kapplinger series (0.16%) - 64/60,618 in ExAC (0.11%) - 38/3189 Finnish in ExAC (1.2%) -162/141,162 in gnomAD (0.11%); -115/13031 Finnish in gnomAD (0.88%) Chevalier et al (2001) reported the variant in association with what the authors described as acquired long QT syndrome. They found the variant in 1 of 16 cases. The individual with the variant was a 45yo male with no prior medical history of family history of sudden death. He was hospitalized for recent syncopal episodes. An ECG at admission showed QT prolongation and complete AV block, he was diagnosed with "Torsades de pointes" complicating an AV bock and a pacemaker was placed and the QT interval returned to normal once he was paced. Tester et al (2005) observed the variant in 2 of 541 cases. This publication is a compendium of variants identified in cases referred to Dr. Ackerman's research lab for long QT genetic testing. No individual clinical or segregation data was provided. Of note when considering this paper, it is likely that ~25% of patients in this cohort did not actually have long QT syndrome (based on the reported yield). Millat et al (2006) reported the variant in 3 of 44 unrelated individuals from their French cohort with long QT syndrome with QTc intervals ranging from 483 to 540 ms. No segregation data was provided. They analyzed 5 long QT genes. Hinterseer et al (2006) reported the variant in a 25yo woman who suffered Torsades de Pointes in the setting of transiently impaired LV function, acute respiratory distress syndrome, transient hypokalaemia and QT-prolonging drugs, with a QTc of 485-510 ms. Once her status had normalized and QT-prolonging drugs had been discontinued her QTc was 430 ms and a Dl-sotalol challenge evoked a QTc of 515 ms, which the authors felt was suggestive of a latent susceptibility to QT-prolonging drugs. Four other family members were found to have the variant, "all without clinical manifestations of LQTS". The variant was reported in 4 individuals in the Familion compendium, which includes 2500 patients referred for clinical long QT genetic testing (Kapplinger et al 2009). Those cases likely overlap with the data in Kapa et al (2009) and Giudicessi et al (2012) since these are all from Ackerman's group and use data from his cohort and from the Familion cohort. Of note in considering the cases reported by Kapplinger et al (2009) is the lack of phenotypic data on this cohort, the low yield of 36% (vs. 70% in cohorts with firm diagnoses of long QT), and the lack of clarity regarding which variants were seen with another variant (9% of the cohort had multiple variants). Stattin et al (2012) analyzed 5 long QT genes in 200 unrelated long QT patients from their Swedish cohort and identified this variant in one individual. Hedley et al (2013) report -
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyCardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust-This variant has been reported in the following publications (PMID:11334843;PMID:14760488;PMID:15840476;PMID:16253915;PMID:16432067;PMID:16720674;PMID:16922724;PMID:17275752;PMID:19716085;PMID:19841300). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2023KCNH2: PP2, BS1 -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBlueprint GeneticsNov 10, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 08, 2017The R328C variant in the KCNH2 gene has been previously reported in multiple unrelated individuals with LQTS and was absent in >2,600 reference alleles, when considering all published studies (Tisma-Dupanovic et al., 2013; Kapplinger et al., 2009; Tester et al., 2005; Chevalier et al., 2001). The R328C variant was not observed in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project; however, the 1000 Genomes Project observed this variant at low frequency in 2/198 Finnish alleles and in 2/208 Puerto Rican alleles. One previously asymptomatic individual identified to have the R328C variant developed Torsades de Pointes in the context of respiratory distress, left ventricular dysfunction, and a prolonged QT interval while being treated with multiple medications (Hinterseer et al., 2006). Several relatives who were also found to harbor this variant, including the patient's identical twin, had no clinical evidence of LQTS, leading authors to conclude this patient's arrhythmia likely resulted from multiple factors. Chevalier et al. (2001) reported R328C leads to a partial dominant-negative effect and alters KCNH2 channel function; however, subsequent functional studies found that the channel function of R328C-KCNH2 did not differ significantly from the wild type KCNH2 channel function (Grunnet et al., 2005; Anderson et al., 2006). Nevertheless, R328C is a non-conservative amino acid substitution occurring at a position that is conserved across species. Multiple missense variants in nearby residues (S320W, S320L, D323N, P334L) have been reported in Human Genome Mutation Database in association with LQTS (Stenson et al., 2014). Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is pathogenic or benign. -
Long QT syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchCSER _CC_NCGL, University of WashingtonDec 01, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 18, 2024- -
Long QT syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 06, 2020This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
KCNH2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 19, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 07, 2018- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.57
CardioboostArm
Benign
0.091
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.18
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.33
Cadd
Pathogenic
34
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.90
D;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.55
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.54
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.83
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.99
D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.21
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.055
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.67
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.0
M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.80
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-4.1
D;.
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.77
Sift
Uncertain
0.0040
D;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.12
T;T
Polyphen
1.0
D;.
Vest4
0.87
MVP
0.99
MPC
2.4
ClinPred
0.14
T
GERP RS
4.8
Varity_R
0.20
gMVP
0.77

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs199473505; hg19: chr7-150654525; COSMIC: COSV51170714; COSMIC: COSV51170714; API