rs199473517
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 13 ACMG points: 13P and 0B. PS1PM1PM2PP2PP3_Strong
The NM_000238.4(KCNH2):c.1689G>T(p.Trp563Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as not provided (no stars). Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Likely pathogenic in ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. W563G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000238.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- long QT syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- long QT syndrome 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
- short QT syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
- short QT syndrome type 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
- Brugada syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCNH2 | NM_000238.4 | c.1689G>T | p.Trp563Cys | missense_variant | Exon 7 of 15 | ENST00000262186.10 | NP_000229.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 34
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 36
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 34
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Congenital long QT syndrome Other:1
This variant has been reported as associated with Long QT syndrome in the following publications (PMID:19926013). This is a literature report, and does not necessarily reflect the clinical interpretation of the Imperial College / Royal Brompton Cardiovascular Genetics laboratory. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at