rs199473712

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_182894.3(VSX2):​c.866G>A​(p.Gly289Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000915 in 1,594,918 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G289G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000094 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

VSX2
NM_182894.3 missense

Scores

4
15

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance no assertion criteria provided U:1O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.36

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
VSX2 (HGNC:1975): (visual system homeobox 2) This gene encodes a homeobox protein originally described as a retina-specific transcription factor. Mutations in this gene are associated with microphthalmia, cataracts and iris abnormalities. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
VSX2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • isolated microphthalmia 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • microphthalmia, isolated, with coloboma 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • microphthalmia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • isolated anophthalmia-microphthalmia syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • microphthalmia, isolated, with coloboma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010718346).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000722 (11/152338) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00228 (11/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00128. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 8 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
VSX2NM_182894.3 linkc.866G>A p.Gly289Asp missense_variant Exon 5 of 5 ENST00000261980.3 NP_878314.1 P58304

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
VSX2ENST00000261980.3 linkc.866G>A p.Gly289Asp missense_variant Exon 5 of 5 1 NM_182894.3 ENSP00000261980.2 P58304

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000723
AC:
11
AN:
152220
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00228
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000175
AC:
37
AN:
211534
AF XY:
0.000254
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000936
AC:
135
AN:
1442580
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000138
AC XY:
99
AN XY:
715492
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33250
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41490
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25670
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39008
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00154
AC:
128
AN:
83078
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
51442
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5750
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000181
AC:
2
AN:
1103242
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000838
AC:
5
AN:
59650
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
10
20
31
41
51
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000722
AC:
11
AN:
152338
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000107
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74488
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41584
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15308
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00228
AC:
11
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.507
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756
ExAC
AF:
0.000256
AC:
31
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Other:1
Revision: no assertion criteria provided
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Microphthalmia, isolated, with coloboma 3 Uncertain:1
Apr 06, 2018
Counsyl
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

not provided Other:1
-
SN ONGC Dept of Genetics and Molecular biology Vision Research Foundation
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.29
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.22
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.25
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.25
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.096
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.67
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.041
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.011
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.11
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.2
L
PhyloP100
2.4
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.54
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.4
N
REVEL
Benign
0.23
Sift
Benign
0.18
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.70
T
Polyphen
0.040
B
Vest4
0.12
MutPred
0.33
Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.1571);
MVP
0.85
MPC
0.28
ClinPred
0.053
T
GERP RS
3.9
Varity_R
0.11
gMVP
0.14
Mutation Taster
=72/28
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs199473712; hg19: chr14-74727402; API