dbSNP rs199475709: NLRP2:c.281-20C>T (chr19-54974480-C-T) – ACMG Classification: Likely_benign (-4 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong

The NM_017852.5(NLRP2):c.281-20C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000915 in 1,606,164 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as not provided (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000095 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NLRP2
NM_017852.5 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

not provided no classification provided O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0640

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

NLRP2 (HGNC:22948): (NLR family pyrin domain containing 2) This gene is a member of the nucleotide-binding and leucine-rich repeat receptor (NLR) family, and is predicted to contain an N-terminal pyrin effector domain (PYD), a centrally-located nucleotide-binding and oligomerization domain (NACHT) and C-terminal leucine-rich repeats (LRR). Members of this gene family are thought to be important regulators of immune responses. This gene product interacts with components of the IkB kinase (IKK) complex, and can regulate both caspase-1 and NF-kB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) activity. The pyrin domain is necessary and sufficient for suppression of NF-kB activity. An allelic variant (rs147585490) has been found that is incapable of blocking the transcriptional activity of NF-kB. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2016]

NLRP2 links:

RPL36AP50 (HGNC:36372): (ribosomal protein L36a pseudogene 50)

RPL36AP50 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.93).

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_017852.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
NLRP2	NM_017852.5	MANE Select	c.281-20C>T	intron	N/A	NP_060322.1	Q9NX02-1
NLRP2	NM_001174081.3		c.281-20C>T	intron	N/A	NP_001167552.1	Q9NX02-1
NLRP2	NM_001348003.2		c.281-20C>T	intron	N/A	NP_001334932.1	J3KN39

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
NLRP2	ENST00000448584.7	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.281-20C>T	intron	N/A	ENSP00000409370.2	Q9NX02-1
NLRP2	ENST00000543010.5	TSL:1	c.281-20C>T	intron	N/A	ENSP00000445135.1	Q9NX02-1
NLRP2	ENST00000263437.10	TSL:2	c.281-20C>T	intron	N/A	ENSP00000263437.6	J3KN39

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000592

AC:

AN:

152020

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000393

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000875

AC:

AN:

251304

AF XY:

0.0000663

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000434

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000949

AC:

138

AN:

1454026

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000981

AC XY:

AN XY:

723960

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33310

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000336

AC:

AN:

44688

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26086

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39632

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000128

AC:

AN:

86070

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53372

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5758

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000959

AC:

106

AN:

1104944

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000831

AC:

AN:

60166

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.449

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000592

AC:

AN:

152138

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74372

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41514

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000393

AC:

AN:

15270

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3466

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5178

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4810

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10590

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

67996

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2108

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.514

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000434

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000793

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:not provided

Revision:no classification provided

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

not provided (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.93

CADD

Benign

1.4

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.18

PhyloP100

-0.064

PromoterAI

0.0085

Neutral

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over