rs199520183
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BP4
The NM_033223.5(GABRG3):c.1151C>A(p.Pro384Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,682 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P384R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_033223.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_033223.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GABRG3 | NM_033223.5 | MANE Select | c.1151C>A | p.Pro384Gln | missense | Exon 10 of 10 | NP_150092.2 | Q99928-1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GABRG3 | ENST00000615808.5 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1151C>A | p.Pro384Gln | missense | Exon 10 of 10 | ENSP00000479113.1 | Q99928-1 | |
| GABRG3 | ENST00000333743.10 | TSL:5 | c.614C>A | p.Pro205Gln | missense | Exon 7 of 7 | ENSP00000331912.7 | A0A0A0MR73 | |
| ENSG00000259168 | ENST00000556642.1 | TSL:2 | n.85+8485G>T | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461682Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727118 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at