rs199523510

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000088.4(COL1A1):c.299-15C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000139 in 1,614,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00023 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

COL1A1
NM_000088.4 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.118

Variant links:

Genes affected

COL1A1 (HGNC:2197): (collagen type I alpha 1 chain) This gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen whose triple helix comprises two alpha1 chains and one alpha2 chain. Type I is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Classical type, Caffey Disease and idiopathic osteoporosis. Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes 17 and 22, where this gene and the gene for platelet-derived growth factor beta are located, are associated with a particular type of skin tumor called dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, resulting from unregulated expression of the growth factor. Two transcripts, resulting from the use of alternate polyadenylation signals, have been identified for this gene. [provided by R. Dalgleish, Feb 2008]

COL1A1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).

BP6

Variant 17-50199605-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-50199605-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 447142.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr17-50199605-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000129 (189/1461790) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00521 (30/5756). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00375. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 117 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 35 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL1A1	NM_000088.4 link	c.299-15C>T	intron_variant	Intron 2 of 50	ENST00000225964.10	NP_000079.2	P02452
COL1A1	XM_011524341.2 link	c.299-15C>T	intron_variant	Intron 2 of 47		XP_011522643.1
COL1A1	XM_005257058.5 link	c.299-15C>T	intron_variant	Intron 2 of 48		XP_005257115.2
COL1A1	XM_005257059.5 link	c.299-15C>T	intron_variant	Intron 2 of 37		XP_005257116.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL1A1	ENST00000225964.10 link	c.299-15C>T	intron_variant	Intron 2 of 50	1	NM_000088.4	ENSP00000225964.6	P02452
COL1A1	ENST00000507689.1 link	c.353-15C>T	intron_variant	Intron 1 of 3	2		ENSP00000460459.1	I3L3H7
COL1A1	ENST00000474644.1 link	n.418-15C>T	intron_variant	Intron 2 of 3	3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000230

AC:

AN:

152202

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00111

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00103

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00191

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000187

AC:

AN:

251360

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000236

AC XY:

AN XY:

135870

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000578

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000882

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000158

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000129

AC:

189

AN:

1461790

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000161

AC XY:

117

AN XY:

727202

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000134

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000742

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000630

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000298

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000230

AC:

AN:

152318

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000282

AC XY:

AN XY:

74464

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000722

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00111

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00103

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00189

Alfa

AF:

0.000130

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000325

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Mar 09, 2018

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jan 25, 2017

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 08, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: COL1A1 c.299-15C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide located at a position not widely known to affect splicing. Consensus agreement among computation tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00019 in 251360 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 6.65 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in COL1A1 causing Osteogenesis Imperfecta phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.299-15C>T in individuals affected with Osteogenesis Imperfecta and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Seven submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Six submitters classified the variant as likely benign/benign while one classified as VUS. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Infantile cortical hyperostosis

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Osteogenesis imperfecta

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, arthrochalasia type

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Oct 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

COL1A1: BS1, BS2 -

Osteogenesis imperfecta type I

Benign:1

Jan 07, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.79

CADD

Benign

7.2

DANN

Benign

0.93

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over