rs199587016
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000447.3(PSEN2):c.954C>T(p.Pro318=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000225 in 1,613,320 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00021 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
PSEN2
NM_000447.3 synonymous
NM_000447.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.11
Genes affected
PSEN2 (HGNC:9509): (presenilin 2) Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with an inherited form of the disease carry mutations in the presenilin proteins (PSEN1 or PSEN2) or the amyloid precursor protein (APP). These disease-linked mutations result in increased production of the longer form of amyloid-beta (main component of amyloid deposits found in AD brains). Presenilins are postulated to regulate APP processing through their effects on gamma-secretase, an enzyme that cleaves APP. Also, it is thought that the presenilins are involved in the cleavage of the Notch receptor such that, they either directly regulate gamma-secretase activity, or themselves act are protease enzymes. Two alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms of PSEN2 have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).
BP6
Variant 1-226891345-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-226891345-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 295994.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=2}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00021 (32/152308) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000118 (8/68006). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000584. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 17 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 32 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSEN2 | NM_000447.3 | c.954C>T | p.Pro318= | synonymous_variant | 10/13 | ENST00000366783.8 | NP_000438.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSEN2 | ENST00000366783.8 | c.954C>T | p.Pro318= | synonymous_variant | 10/13 | 5 | NM_000447.3 | ENSP00000355747 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
32
AN:
152190
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000410 AC: 102AN: 248488Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000379 AC XY: 51AN XY: 134516
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
102
AN:
248488
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
51
AN XY:
134516
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000227 AC: 331AN: 1461012Hom.: 2 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000246 AC XY: 179AN XY: 726704
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
331
AN:
1461012
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
179
AN XY:
726704
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152308Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000228 AC XY: 17AN XY: 74472
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
32
AN:
152308
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
74472
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Alzheimer disease 4 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Sep 21, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1V Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 21, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at