rs199664723
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_014244.5(ADAMTS2):c.1149C>T(p.Thr383=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000271 in 1,613,372 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T383T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014244.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAMTS2 | NM_014244.5 | c.1149C>T | p.Thr383= | synonymous_variant | 7/22 | ENST00000251582.12 | |
ADAMTS2 | NM_021599.4 | c.1149C>T | p.Thr383= | synonymous_variant | 7/11 | ||
ADAMTS2 | XM_047417895.1 | c.654C>T | p.Thr218= | synonymous_variant | 6/21 | ||
ADAMTS2 | XM_047417896.1 | c.267C>T | p.Thr89= | synonymous_variant | 5/20 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAMTS2 | ENST00000251582.12 | c.1149C>T | p.Thr383= | synonymous_variant | 7/22 | 1 | NM_014244.5 | P2 | |
ADAMTS2 | ENST00000274609.5 | c.1149C>T | p.Thr383= | synonymous_variant | 7/11 | 1 | |||
ADAMTS2 | ENST00000518335.3 | c.1149C>T | p.Thr383= | synonymous_variant | 7/21 | 3 | A2 | ||
ADAMTS2 | ENST00000698889.1 | c.1149C>T | p.Thr383= | synonymous_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 7/21 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000190 AC: 29AN: 152240Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000229 AC: 57AN: 248690Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000222 AC XY: 30AN XY: 134856
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000279 AC: 408AN: 1461014Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000301 AC XY: 219AN XY: 726758
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000190 AC: 29AN: 152358Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000201 AC XY: 15AN XY: 74496
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, dermatosparaxis type Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 20, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Mar 01, 2020 | - - |
ADAMTS2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 16, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at