rs199692186

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 4P and 5B. PM1PM2BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_001365536.1(SCN9A):ā€‹c.3002A>Gā€‹(p.Tyr1001Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000704 in 1,561,280 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. Y1001Y) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00055 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00072 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SCN9A
NM_001365536.1 missense

Scores

2
8
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:8B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.83
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN9A (HGNC:10597): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 9) This gene encodes a voltage-gated sodium channel which plays a significant role in nociception signaling. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary erythermalgia, channelopathy-associated insensitivity to pain, and paroxysmal extreme pain disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]
SCN1A-AS1 (HGNC:54069): (SCN1A and SCN9A antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 3 benign, 8 uncertain in NM_001365536.1
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01835671).
BP6
Variant 2-166272748-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-166272748-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 130260.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=5, Likely_benign=5, Benign=2}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SCN9ANM_001365536.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.3002A>G p.Tyr1001Cys missense_variant 17/27 ENST00000642356.2
SCN1A-AS1NR_110260.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.870-4340T>C intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SCN9AENST00000642356.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.3002A>G p.Tyr1001Cys missense_variant 17/27 NM_001365536.1 P1Q15858-1
SCN1A-AS1ENST00000651574.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1548-4340T>C intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000547
AC:
83
AN:
151856
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000725
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0121
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00432
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000750
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000480
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000634
AC:
130
AN:
205034
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000590
AC XY:
65
AN XY:
110138
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000135
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00513
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000499
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000266
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000856
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00127
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000721
AC:
1016
AN:
1409424
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000731
AC XY:
509
AN XY:
696032
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000159
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000840
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00458
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000921
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000175
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000788
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000500
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000547
AC:
83
AN:
151856
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000553
AC XY:
41
AN XY:
74100
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000725
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00432
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000750
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000480
Alfa
AF:
0.000965
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000620
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000276
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00111
AC:
9
ExAC
AF:
0.000580
AC:
70
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:8Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:7Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicOct 12, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The SCN9A p.Tyr990Cys variant was identified in 3 of 3192 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.00094; one compound heterozygote and two heterozygotes) from individuals with peripheral neuropathy (Wadhawan_2017_PMID_29264398; Eijkenboom_2018_PMID_30554136). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs199692186) and ClinVar (classified as likely benign by PreventionGenetics, Invitae and Illumina, and as uncertain significance by GeneDx, EGL Genetic Diagnostics and Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago, and classified as pathogenic by Bioinformatics Core Luxembourg Center for Systems Biomedicine). The variant was identified in control databases in 143 of 236408 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0006049 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: Ashkenazi Jewish in 35 of 6532 chromosomes (freq: 0.005358), Other in 7 of 5826 chromosomes (freq: 0.001202), European (non-Finnish) in 92 of 113582 chromosomes (freq: 0.00081), European (Finnish) in 5 of 22294 chromosomes (freq: 0.000224), African in 3 of 23534 chromosomes (freq: 0.000128) and South Asian in 1 of 20024 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005), but was not observed in the Latino or East Asian populations. The p.Tyr990 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoAug 27, 2013- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Nov 03, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024SCN9A: BP4 -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 19, 2018The Y990C variant has been reported previously in two individuals with Rolandic epilepsy; however, additional information was not provided (Bobbili et al., 2018). The Y990C variant is observed in 35/6312 (0.6%) alleles from individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish background in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016). The Y990C variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. In-silico analyses, including protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, support a deleterious effect. Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic variant or a rare benign variant. -
Childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria providedcase-controlBioinformatics Core, Luxembourg Center for Systems BiomedicineJan 01, 2017CAADphred>15 -
Channelopathy-associated congenital insensitivity to pain, autosomal recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Primary erythromelalgia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 29, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, type 7;C2752089:Neuropathy, hereditary sensory and autonomic, type 2A Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 27, 2024- -
Small fiber neuropathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.096
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.072
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.050
CADD
Uncertain
23
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.61
.;D;.;.;D;.
Eigen
Benign
0.024
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.057
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.49
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.81
T;.;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.11
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.018
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.18
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.5
.;M;.;.;M;M
MutationTaster
Benign
0.91
N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.42
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-5.7
D;.;.;.;.;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.49
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;.;.;.;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.052
T;T;.;.;.;T
Vest4
0.72
MVP
0.73
MPC
0.62
ClinPred
0.13
T
GERP RS
5.4
Varity_R
0.53
gMVP
0.54

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs199692186; hg19: chr2-167129258; COSMIC: COSV99069747; COSMIC: COSV99069747; API