rs199776761
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000719.7(CACNA1C):c.5885G>A(p.Arg1962Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000104 in 1,613,974 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R1962R) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000719.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CACNA1C | NM_000719.7 | c.5885G>A | p.Arg1962Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | ENST00000399655.6 | NP_000710.5 | |
| CACNA1C | NM_001167623.2 | c.5885G>A | p.Arg1962Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | ENST00000399603.6 | NP_001161095.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CACNA1C | ENST00000399603.6 | c.5885G>A | p.Arg1962Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | 5 | NM_001167623.2 | ENSP00000382512.1 | ||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000399655.6 | c.5885G>A | p.Arg1962Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | 1 | NM_000719.7 | ENSP00000382563.1 | ||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000682544.1 | c.6224G>A | p.Arg2075Gln | missense_variant | Exon 49 of 50 | ENSP00000507184.1 | ||||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000406454.8 | c.6098G>A | p.Arg2033Gln | missense_variant | Exon 47 of 48 | 5 | ENSP00000385896.3 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000399634.6 | c.6065G>A | p.Arg2022Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | 5 | ENSP00000382542.2 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000683824.1 | c.6050G>A | p.Arg2017Gln | missense_variant | Exon 47 of 48 | ENSP00000507867.1 | ||||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000347598.9 | c.6029G>A | p.Arg2010Gln | missense_variant | Exon 48 of 49 | 1 | ENSP00000266376.6 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000344100.7 | c.6008G>A | p.Arg2003Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | 1 | ENSP00000341092.3 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000327702.12 | c.5990G>A | p.Arg1997Gln | missense_variant | Exon 47 of 48 | 1 | ENSP00000329877.7 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000399617.6 | c.5990G>A | p.Arg1997Gln | missense_variant | Exon 47 of 48 | 5 | ENSP00000382526.1 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000682462.1 | c.5975G>A | p.Arg1992Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | ENSP00000507105.1 | ||||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000683781.1 | c.5975G>A | p.Arg1992Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | ENSP00000507434.1 | ||||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000683840.1 | c.5975G>A | p.Arg1992Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | ENSP00000507612.1 | ||||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000683956.1 | c.5975G>A | p.Arg1992Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | ENSP00000506882.1 | ||||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000399638.5 | c.5969G>A | p.Arg1990Gln | missense_variant | Exon 47 of 48 | 1 | ENSP00000382547.1 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000335762.10 | c.5960G>A | p.Arg1987Gln | missense_variant | Exon 47 of 48 | 5 | ENSP00000336982.5 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000399606.5 | c.5945G>A | p.Arg1982Gln | missense_variant | Exon 47 of 48 | 1 | ENSP00000382515.1 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000399621.5 | c.5942G>A | p.Arg1981Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | 1 | ENSP00000382530.1 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000399637.5 | c.5942G>A | p.Arg1981Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | 1 | ENSP00000382546.1 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000402845.7 | c.5942G>A | p.Arg1981Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | 1 | ENSP00000385724.3 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000399629.5 | c.5936G>A | p.Arg1979Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | 1 | ENSP00000382537.1 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000682336.1 | c.5927G>A | p.Arg1976Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | ENSP00000507898.1 | ||||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000399591.5 | c.5909G>A | p.Arg1970Gln | missense_variant | Exon 45 of 46 | 1 | ENSP00000382500.1 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000399595.5 | c.5909G>A | p.Arg1970Gln | missense_variant | Exon 45 of 46 | 1 | ENSP00000382504.1 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000399649.5 | c.5903G>A | p.Arg1968Gln | missense_variant | Exon 45 of 46 | 1 | ENSP00000382557.1 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000399597.5 | c.5885G>A | p.Arg1962Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | 1 | ENSP00000382506.1 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000399601.5 | c.5885G>A | p.Arg1962Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | 1 | ENSP00000382510.1 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000399641.6 | c.5885G>A | p.Arg1962Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | 1 | ENSP00000382549.1 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000399644.5 | c.5885G>A | p.Arg1962Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | 1 | ENSP00000382552.1 | |||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000682835.1 | c.5885G>A | p.Arg1962Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | ENSP00000507282.1 | ||||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000683482.1 | c.5876G>A | p.Arg1959Gln | missense_variant | Exon 46 of 47 | ENSP00000507169.1 | ||||
| CACNA1C | ENST00000682686.1 | c.5852G>A | p.Arg1951Gln | missense_variant | Exon 45 of 46 | ENSP00000507309.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000243 AC: 37AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000928 AC: 23AN: 247926 AF XY: 0.0000891 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000896 AC: 131AN: 1461646Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000976 AC XY: 71AN XY: 727116 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000243 AC: 37AN: 152328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 16AN XY: 74496 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
CACNA1C-related disorder Uncertain:1
The CACNA1C c.5885G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg1962Gln. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.071% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-2797713-G-A). Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
not specified Benign:1
Variant summary: CACNA1C c.5885G>A (p.Arg1962Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 9.3e-05 in 247926 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00065 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 65 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CACNA1C causing Timothy Syndrome phenotype (1e-05). c.5885G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Timothy Syndrome. These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Timothy Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 190626). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Timothy syndrome;C2678478:Brugada syndrome 3;CN260585:Long qt syndrome 8 Benign:1
- -
Long QT syndrome Benign:1
- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at