rs199790689

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_004168.4(SDHA):c.1664-8G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00267 in 1,611,982 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 115 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.014 ( 67 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 48 hom. )

Consequence

SDHA
NM_004168.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.0003518

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.828

Variant links:

Genes affected

SDHA (HGNC:10680): (succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A) This gene encodes a major catalytic subunit of succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, a complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits and is localized in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a form of mitochondrial respiratory chain deficiency known as Leigh Syndrome. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 3q29. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]

SDHA links:

ENSG00000286001 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000286001 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).

BP6

Variant 5-251330-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-251330-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 130275.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-251330-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0142 (2163/152232) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0497 (2064/41522). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0479. There are 67 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1021 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 67 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SDHA	NM_004168.4 link	c.1664-8G>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 12 of 14	ENST00000264932.11	NP_004159.2	P31040-1A0A024QZ30

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SDHA	ENST00000264932.11 link	c.1664-8G>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 12 of 14	1	NM_004168.4	ENSP00000264932.6		P31040-1
ENSG00000286001	ENST00000651543.1 link	n.*397-8G>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 11 of 23			ENSP00000499215.1		A0A494C1T6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0142

AC:

2159

AN:

152114

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0498

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00452

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000206

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00717

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00339

AC:

827

AN:

243776

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00269

AC XY:

357

AN XY:

132806

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0525

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00201

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000985

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000118

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00135

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00147

AC:

2140

AN:

1459750

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00126

AC XY:

914

AN XY:

726098

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0513

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00232

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000122

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00282

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0142

AC:

2163

AN:

152232

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0137

AC XY:

1021

AN XY:

74430

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0497

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00451

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000206

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00710

Alfa

AF:

0.00756

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0157

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

Feb 22, 2016

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 11, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Leigh syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1GG;C3279992:Paragangliomas 5;C5543254:Neurodegeneration with ataxia and late-onset optic atrophy;C5700310:Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1

Benign:1

Oct 08, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Paragangliomas 5;C5700310:Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1

Benign:1

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Sep 21, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

SDHA-related disorder

Benign:1

Mar 15, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Paragangliomas 5

Benign:1

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.53

CADD

Benign

7.7

DANN

Benign

0.57

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.00035

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.020

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over