rs199840543
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_020433.5(JPH2):c.780C>T(p.Ala260=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000382 in 1,573,500 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00047 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00037 ( 7 hom. )
Consequence
JPH2
NM_020433.5 synonymous
NM_020433.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.129
Genes affected
JPH2 (HGNC:14202): (junctophilin 2) Junctional complexes between the plasma membrane and endoplasmic/sarcoplasmic reticulum are a common feature of all excitable cell types and mediate cross talk between cell surface and intracellular ion channels. The protein encoded by this gene is a component of junctional complexes and is composed of a C-terminal hydrophobic segment spanning the endoplasmic/sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane and a remaining cytoplasmic domain that shows specific affinity for the plasma membrane. This gene is a member of the junctophilin gene family. Alternative splicing has been observed at this locus and two variants encoding distinct isoforms are described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
?
Variant 20-44160007-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-44160007-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 226677.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr20-44160007-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.129 with no splicing effect.
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000467 (71/152144) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0136 (70/5140). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0111. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 34 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 7 SD gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPH2 | NM_020433.5 | c.780C>T | p.Ala260= | synonymous_variant | 2/6 | ENST00000372980.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPH2 | ENST00000372980.4 | c.780C>T | p.Ala260= | synonymous_variant | 2/6 | 5 | NM_020433.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000467 AC: 71AN: 152030Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
71
AN:
152030
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00126 AC: 232AN: 184154Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00128 AC XY: 128AN XY: 100348
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
232
AN:
184154
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
128
AN XY:
100348
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000373 AC: 530AN: 1421356Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000386 AC XY: 272AN XY: 704680
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
530
AN:
1421356
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
272
AN XY:
704680
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000467 AC: 71AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000457 AC XY: 34AN XY: 74370
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
71
AN:
152144
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
34
AN XY:
74370
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
3474
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jun 25, 2015 | p.Ala260Ala in exon 2 of JPH2: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 3.5% (73/2104) of Eas t Asian chromosomes, including 3 homozygotes, by the Exome Aggregation Consortiu m (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs199840543). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 16, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 17, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 11, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at