rs199862790

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2_Supporting

The NM_001164508.2(NEB):c.6020T>C(p.Met2007Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000219 in 1,613,226 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

NEB
NM_001164508.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.717

Variant links:

Genes affected

NEB (HGNC:7720): (nebulin) This gene encodes nebulin, a giant protein component of the cytoskeletal matrix that coexists with the thick and thin filaments within the sarcomeres of skeletal muscle. In most vertebrates, nebulin accounts for 3 to 4% of the total myofibrillar protein. The encoded protein contains approximately 30-amino acid long modules that can be classified into 7 types and other repeated modules. Protein isoform sizes vary from 600 to 800 kD due to alternative splicing that is tissue-, species-,and developmental stage-specific. Of the 183 exons in the nebulin gene, at least 43 are alternatively spliced, although exons 143 and 144 are not found in the same transcript. Of the several thousand transcript variants predicted for nebulin, the RefSeq Project has decided to create three representative RefSeq records. Mutations in this gene are associated with recessive nemaline myopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

NEB links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010756761).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000138 (21/152300) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00414 (20/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00274. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 15 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NEB	NM_001164507.2 link	c.6020T>C	p.Met2007Thr	missense_variant	Exon 47 of 182	ENST00000427231.7	NP_001157979.2
NEB	NM_001164508.2 link	c.6020T>C	p.Met2007Thr	missense_variant	Exon 47 of 182	ENST00000397345.8	NP_001157980.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NEB	ENST00000397345.8 link	c.6020T>C	p.Met2007Thr	missense_variant	Exon 47 of 182	5	NM_001164508.2	ENSP00000380505.3	P20929-2
NEB	ENST00000427231.7 link	c.6020T>C	p.Met2007Thr	missense_variant	Exon 47 of 182	5	NM_001164507.2	ENSP00000416578.2	P20929-3
NEB	ENST00000409198.5 link	c.6020T>C	p.Met2007Thr	missense_variant	Exon 47 of 150	5		ENSP00000386259.1	P20929-4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000138

AC:

AN:

152182

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000390

AC:

AN:

248948

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000585

AC XY:

AN XY:

135046

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00317

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000227

AC:

332

AN:

1460926

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000326

AC XY:

237

AN XY:

726780

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000598

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00356

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000180

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000348

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000138

AC:

AN:

152300

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000201

AC XY:

AN XY:

74472

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00414

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000136

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000642

ExAC

AF:

0.000455

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Nemaline myopathy 2

Uncertain:3Benign:1

Sep 11, 2019

Baylor Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -

Jan 17, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jul 16, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Uncertain:1

Mar 02, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The c.6020T>C (p.M2007T) alteration is located in exon 47 (coding exon 45) of the NEB gene. This alteration results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 6020, causing the methionine (M) at amino acid position 2007 to be replaced by a threonine (T). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

NEB-related disorder

Uncertain:1

Sep 15, 2023

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The NEB c.6020T>C variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Met2007Thr. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.32% of alleles in individuals of South Asian descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/2-152515634-A-G). Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.13

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.57

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.60

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.94

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.040

.;.;T;.;T;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.52

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.36

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.56

LIST_S2

Benign

0.59

T;T;T;T;T;.;.

M_CAP

Benign

0.030

MetaRNN

Benign

0.011

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.045

N;N;.;N;N;N;N

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.50

PROVEAN

Benign

-2.1

N;N;.;N;N;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.13

Sift

Benign

0.33

T;T;.;T;T;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.12

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0020

.;.;.;.;B;.;.

Vest4

0.51

MutPred

0.56

Loss of stability (P = 0.0459);Loss of stability (P = 0.0459);Loss of stability (P = 0.0459);Loss of stability (P = 0.0459);Loss of stability (P = 0.0459);Loss of stability (P = 0.0459);Loss of stability (P = 0.0459);

MVP

0.24

MPC

0.058

ClinPred

0.034

GERP RS

2.5

Varity_R

0.19

gMVP

0.35

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over