rs199862790

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2_Supporting

The NM_001164508.2(NEB):ā€‹c.6020T>Cā€‹(p.Met2007Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000219 in 1,613,226 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00023 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

NEB
NM_001164508.2 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.717
Variant links:
Genes affected
NEB (HGNC:7720): (nebulin) This gene encodes nebulin, a giant protein component of the cytoskeletal matrix that coexists with the thick and thin filaments within the sarcomeres of skeletal muscle. In most vertebrates, nebulin accounts for 3 to 4% of the total myofibrillar protein. The encoded protein contains approximately 30-amino acid long modules that can be classified into 7 types and other repeated modules. Protein isoform sizes vary from 600 to 800 kD due to alternative splicing that is tissue-, species-,and developmental stage-specific. Of the 183 exons in the nebulin gene, at least 43 are alternatively spliced, although exons 143 and 144 are not found in the same transcript. Of the several thousand transcript variants predicted for nebulin, the RefSeq Project has decided to create three representative RefSeq records. Mutations in this gene are associated with recessive nemaline myopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010756761).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000138 (21/152300) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00414 (20/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00274. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 15 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR geneVariant has number of homozygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
NEBNM_001164507.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.6020T>C p.Met2007Thr missense_variant 47/182 ENST00000427231.7 NP_001157979.2
NEBNM_001164508.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.6020T>C p.Met2007Thr missense_variant 47/182 ENST00000397345.8 NP_001157980.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NEBENST00000397345.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.6020T>C p.Met2007Thr missense_variant 47/1825 NM_001164508.2 ENSP00000380505.3 P20929-2
NEBENST00000427231.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.6020T>C p.Met2007Thr missense_variant 47/1825 NM_001164507.2 ENSP00000416578.2 P20929-3
NEBENST00000409198.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.6020T>C p.Met2007Thr missense_variant 47/1505 ENSP00000386259.1 P20929-4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000138
AC:
21
AN:
152182
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000390
AC:
97
AN:
248948
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000585
AC XY:
79
AN XY:
135046
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00317
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000227
AC:
332
AN:
1460926
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000326
AC XY:
237
AN XY:
726780
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000598
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00356
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000348
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000138
AC:
21
AN:
152300
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000201
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00414
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000136
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000642
ExAC
AF:
0.000455
AC:
55
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Nemaline myopathy 2 Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Jan 17, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsSep 11, 2019This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 25, 2024- -
NEB-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesSep 15, 2023The NEB c.6020T>C variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Met2007Thr. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.32% of alleles in individuals of South Asian descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/2-152515634-A-G). Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 02, 2023The c.6020T>C (p.M2007T) alteration is located in exon 47 (coding exon 45) of the NEB gene. This alteration results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 6020, causing the methionine (M) at amino acid position 2007 to be replaced by a threonine (T). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.13
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.57
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
15
DANN
Benign
0.94
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.040
.;.;T;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.52
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.36
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.56
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.59
T;T;T;T;T;.;.
M_CAP
Benign
0.030
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.011
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.045
N;N;.;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.50
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.1
N;N;.;N;N;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.13
Sift
Benign
0.33
T;T;.;T;T;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.12
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0020
.;.;.;.;B;.;.
Vest4
0.51
MutPred
0.56
Loss of stability (P = 0.0459);Loss of stability (P = 0.0459);Loss of stability (P = 0.0459);Loss of stability (P = 0.0459);Loss of stability (P = 0.0459);Loss of stability (P = 0.0459);Loss of stability (P = 0.0459);
MVP
0.24
MPC
0.058
ClinPred
0.034
T
GERP RS
2.5
Varity_R
0.19
gMVP
0.35

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs199862790; hg19: chr2-152515634; API