rs199868951

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The ENST00000369519.4(RBM20):​c.448G>A​(p.Ala150Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000475 in 1,551,758 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00053 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00047 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

RBM20
ENST00000369519.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.316
Variant links:
Genes affected
RBM20 (HGNC:27424): (RNA binding motif protein 20) This gene encodes a protein that binds RNA and regulates splicing. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial dilated cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004958421).
BP6
Variant 10-110781057-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-110781057-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 44018.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=6, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=2}. Variant chr10-110781057-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 80 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
RBM20NM_001134363.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.448G>A p.Ala150Thr missense_variant 2/14 ENST00000369519.4 NP_001127835.2
RBM20XM_017016103.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.283G>A p.Ala95Thr missense_variant 2/14 XP_016871592.1
RBM20XM_017016104.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.64G>A p.Ala22Thr missense_variant 2/14 XP_016871593.1
RBM20XM_047425116.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.64G>A p.Ala22Thr missense_variant 2/14 XP_047281072.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RBM20ENST00000369519.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.448G>A p.Ala150Thr missense_variant 2/141 NM_001134363.3 ENSP00000358532 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000526
AC:
80
AN:
152178
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00123
AC:
193
AN:
157176
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00112
AC XY:
93
AN XY:
83146
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0187
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000344
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00226
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000469
AC:
657
AN:
1399580
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000453
AC XY:
313
AN XY:
690280
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000316
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000168
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0186
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000936
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00136
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000526
AC:
80
AN:
152178
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000444
AC XY:
33
AN XY:
74340
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000956
Alfa
AF:
0.00180
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000514
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000723
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000943
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.00189
AC:
51

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 16, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineDec 11, 2012Ala150Thr in exon 2 of RBM20: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance due to a lack of conservation across species, including mammals. Of not e, 14 mammals have a Threonine (Thr; this variant) at this position despite high nearby amino acid conservation. In addition, computational analyses (AlignGVGD, PolyPhen2, SIFT) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. In addition, this variant has been identified in 3/3182 European American chromosom es from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs. washington.edu/EVS). -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingStanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford UniversityJan 26, 2013Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. p.Ala150Thr (c.448 G>A, A150T) in the RBM20 gene The variant has not been reported in association with disease. In silico analysis with PolyPhen-2 predicts the variant to be benign. The alanine at codon 150 is not conserved across species, and is in fact a threonine in some species, including mammals. Mutation taster predicts the variant to be benign. In total the variant has not been seen in 5 of ~2,579 published controls and individuals from publicly available population datasets. The variant is reported online in 3 of 1591 Caucasian individuals and 1 of 692 African-American individuals in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project dataset (as of January 27th, 2013). The phenotype of those individuals is not publicly available, however the cohorts that were merged to create this dataset were all either general population samples or samples recruited for common cardiovascular disease such as hypertension. The variant is listed in dbSNP (rs199868951), which refers to the NHLBI data and data from ClinSeq. In ClinSeq it was observed in 1 of 296 individuals; this cohort approximates a general population sample (with respect to Mendelian disease). It is listed in 1000 genomes but only in reference to the dbSNP entry (as of January 27th, 2013). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpSep 26, 2022Variant summary: RBM20 c.448G>A (p.Ala150Thr) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0012 in 157176 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including one homozygote. The observed variant frequency is approximately 26 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RBM20 causing Dilated Cardiomyopathy phenotype (4.7e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Six ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance (n=1) and benign (n=5). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 27, 2024- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioApr 23, 2021- -
RBM20-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesNov 11, 2019This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Familial dilated cardiomyopathy and peripheral neuropathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San DiegoJun 03, 2019- -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2024RBM20: BP4, BS1 -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 19, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.063
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.40
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
CADD
Benign
0.079
DANN
Benign
0.48
Eigen
Benign
-1.6
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.6
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.091
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.051
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0050
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.62
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.27
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.72
N
REVEL
Benign
0.15
Sift
Benign
0.43
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.19
T
Vest4
0.092
MVP
0.088
ClinPred
0.018
T
GERP RS
-6.5
gMVP
0.20

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs199868951; hg19: chr10-112540815; COSMIC: COSV65705680; API