rs199875474

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.80271C>T(p.Val26757Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000726 in 1,613,612 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00051 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00075 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.131

Variant links:

Genes affected

TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]

TTN links:

TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

TTN-AS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).

BP6

Variant 2-178565861-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178565861-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 47384.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=9, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr2-178565861-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-178565861-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.131 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000506 (77/152206) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00664 (32/4820). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00483. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 44 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TTN	NM_001267550.2 link	c.80271C>T	p.Val26757Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 326 of 363	ENST00000589042.5	NP_001254479.2	A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TTN	ENST00000589042.5 link	c.80271C>T	p.Val26757Val	synonymous_variant	Exon 326 of 363	5	NM_001267550.2	ENSP00000467141.1		A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000500

AC:

AN:

152088

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00980

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00643

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00158

AC:

394

AN:

248672

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00199

AC XY:

268

AN XY:

134906

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000290

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0102

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000557

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00846

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00132

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000749

AC:

1094

AN:

1461406

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000981

AC XY:

713

AN XY:

727000

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000598

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0102

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00734

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000999

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00124

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000506

AC:

AN:

152206

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000591

AC XY:

AN XY:

74398

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00980

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00664

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.00106

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000336

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000218

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:17

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:7

Nov 21, 2021

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 08, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 23, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 11, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Val24189Val in exon 275 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 0.9% (145/16512) of South Asian c hromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute .org). -

Oct 06, 2023

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Jan 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

TTN: BP4, BP7 -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G

Benign:1

Jan 27, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Dec 08, 2017

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Tibial muscular dystrophy

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Dec 06, 2012

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.77

CADD

Benign

0.055

DANN

Benign

0.66

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over