rs199914308

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000520.6(HEXA):​c.1527-6T>C variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000695 in 1,613,276 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00085 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00068 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

HEXA
NM_000520.6 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0001057
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.52
Variant links:
Genes affected
HEXA (HGNC:4878): (hexosaminidase subunit alpha) This gene encodes a member of the glycosyl hydrolase 20 family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate the alpha subunit of the lysosomal enzyme beta-hexosaminidase. This enzyme, together with the cofactor GM2 activator protein, catalyzes the degradation of the ganglioside GM2, and other molecules containing terminal N-acetyl hexosamines. Mutations in this gene lead to an accumulation of GM2 ganglioside in neurons, the underlying cause of neurodegenerative disorders termed the GM2 gangliosidoses, including Tay-Sachs disease (GM2-gangliosidosis type I). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.74).
BP6
Variant 15-72344146-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-72344146-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 194339.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr15-72344146-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
HEXANM_000520.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1527-6T>C splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant ENST00000268097.10 NP_000511.2
HEXANM_001318825.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1560-6T>C splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant NP_001305754.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
HEXAENST00000268097.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1527-6T>C splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_000520.6 ENSP00000268097 P1P06865-1
ENST00000570175.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.166-1240A>G intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000841
AC:
128
AN:
152200
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000651
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0138
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000412
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00123
AC:
310
AN:
251334
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00116
AC XY:
158
AN XY:
135838
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000800
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00127
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0154
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000713
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00277
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000680
AC:
993
AN:
1460958
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000671
AC XY:
488
AN XY:
726830
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000688
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00143
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0136
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000373
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00196
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000847
AC:
129
AN:
152318
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000765
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
74482
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000650
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0138
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000412
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.00195
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00111
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000491
EpiControl
AF:
0.00130

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tay-Sachs disease Uncertain:1Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Aug 10, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJul 28, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jan 02, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 03, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 9090523) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoDec 03, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 06, 2021- -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 05, 2022Variant summary: HEXA c.1527-6T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0012 in 251334 control chromosomes including 3 homozygotes (gnomAD). The variant occurs predominantly at a frequency of 0.0013 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD database. This frequency is slightly lower than expected for a pathogenic variant in HEXA causing Tay-Sachs Disease (0.0012 vs 0.0014), suggesting this variant may be benign. c.1527-6T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Tay-Sachs Disease and classified as a neutral polymorphism (Myerowitz_1997). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: two classified it as uncertain significance, four as likely benign, and two as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.74
CADD
Benign
10
DANN
Benign
0.74

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00011
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.040
SpliceAI score (max)
0.16
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs199914308; hg19: chr15-72636487; API