rs199935213

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_002230.4(JUP):​c.2086+13C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000794 in 1,613,064 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00017 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000070 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

JUP
NM_002230.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.953

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
JUP (HGNC:6207): (junction plakoglobin) This gene encodes a major cytoplasmic protein which is the only known constituent common to submembranous plaques of both desmosomes and intermediate junctions. This protein forms distinct complexes with cadherins and desmosomal cadherins and is a member of the catenin family since it contains a distinct repeating amino acid motif called the armadillo repeat. Mutation in this gene has been associated with Naxos disease. Alternative splicing occurs in this gene; however, not all transcripts have been fully described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
JUP Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • inherited epidermolysis bullosa
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • Naxos disease
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • lethal acantholytic epidermolysis bullosa
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
Variant 17-41756162-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-41756162-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 227449.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000171 (26/152300) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00212 (11/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00119. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 11 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
JUPNM_002230.4 linkc.2086+13C>T intron_variant Intron 13 of 13 ENST00000393931.8 NP_002221.1 P14923A0A0S2Z487

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
JUPENST00000393931.8 linkc.2086+13C>T intron_variant Intron 13 of 13 1 NM_002230.4 ENSP00000377508.3 P14923
JUPENST00000310706.9 linkc.2086+13C>T intron_variant Intron 13 of 14 1 ENSP00000311113.5 P14923
JUPENST00000393930.5 linkc.2086+13C>T intron_variant Intron 13 of 14 5 ENSP00000377507.1 P14923

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000171
AC:
26
AN:
152182
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000116
AC:
29
AN:
250402
AF XY:
0.0000813
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000621
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000116
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000763
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000817
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000698
AC:
102
AN:
1460764
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000647
AC XY:
47
AN XY:
726692
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000897
AC:
3
AN:
33462
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000134
AC:
6
AN:
44656
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26096
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000554
AC:
22
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000814
AC:
7
AN:
86038
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53394
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5716
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000720
AC:
8
AN:
1111352
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000928
AC:
56
AN:
60354
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.464
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
7
14
21
28
35
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000171
AC:
26
AN:
152300
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000148
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000265
AC:
11
AN:
41558
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00212
AC:
11
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.483
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
3
5
6
8
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000172
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000215
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 21, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

May 07, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

c.2086+13C>T in intron 13 of JUP: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.1% (6/8300) of East Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggr egation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs199935213). -

Jan 21, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 25, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Naxos disease Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Naxos disease;C1969081:Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12 Benign:1
Jan 26, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.88
CADD
Benign
1.2
DANN
Benign
0.37
PhyloP100
-0.95
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs199935213; hg19: chr17-39912414; API