rs199996308

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001244008.2(KIF1A):c.2475C>T(p.Tyr825Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000895 in 1,604,988 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00073 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00091 ( 18 hom. )

Consequence

KIF1A
NM_001244008.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.85

Variant links:

Genes affected

KIF1A (HGNC:888): (kinesin family member 1A) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the kinesin family and functions as an anterograde motor protein that transports membranous organelles along axonal microtubules. Mutations at this locus have been associated with spastic paraplegia-30 and hereditary sensory neuropathy IIC. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

KIF1A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).

BP6

Variant 2-240758467-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-240758467-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 211278.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=6, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr2-240758467-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr2-240758467-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.85 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000729 (111/152288) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0162 (78/4824). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0133. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 71 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 18 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
KIF1A	NM_001244008.2 link	c.2475C>T	p.Tyr825Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 26 of 49	ENST00000498729.9	NP_001230937.1	Q12756-3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
KIF1A	ENST00000498729.9 link	c.2475C>T	p.Tyr825Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 26 of 49	5	NM_001244008.2	ENSP00000438388.1		Q12756-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000729

AC:

111

AN:

152170

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0162

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000309

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00180

AC:

423

AN:

235624

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00236

AC XY:

302

AN XY:

128094

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000688

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000153

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0135

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000178

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00158

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000912

AC:

1325

AN:

1452700

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00126

AC XY:

910

AN XY:

722014

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000602

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000252

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000509

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0126

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000144

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000917

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000729

AC:

111

AN:

152288

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000954

AC XY:

AN XY:

74456

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000722

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0162

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000309

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.000313

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000230

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00318

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Jun 24, 2015

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 25, 2020

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 16, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Nov 19, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Apr 20, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Hereditary spastic paraplegia

Benign:1

Jan 01, 2018

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary spastic paraplegia 30

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Mar 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

KIF1A: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -

Neuropathy, hereditary sensory, type 2C;C5235139:Hereditary spastic paraplegia 30;C5393830:Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 9

Benign:1

Jan 20, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.73

CADD

Benign

2.1

DANN

Benign

0.71

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over