Menu
GeneBe

rs200017020

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_005732.4(RAD50):c.1211A>G(p.Gln404Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000107 in 1,614,004 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00010 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RAD50
NM_005732.4 missense

Scores

1
11

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.23
Variant links:
Genes affected
RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.014070004).
BP6
Variant 5-132588846-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132588846-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127992.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=5, Likely_benign=4}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RAD50NM_005732.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1211A>G p.Gln404Arg missense_variant 8/25 ENST00000378823.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RAD50ENST00000378823.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1211A>G p.Gln404Arg missense_variant 8/251 NM_005732.4 P1Q92878-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000145
AC:
22
AN:
152200
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00269
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000215
AC:
54
AN:
251038
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000214
AC XY:
29
AN XY:
135676
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00159
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00163
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000353
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000490
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000103
AC:
150
AN:
1461686
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000109
AC XY:
79
AN XY:
727148
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00122
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00204
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000696
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000108
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000315
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000144
AC:
22
AN:
152318
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000175
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00270
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000149
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000132
ExAC
AF:
0.000165
AC:
20
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jul 14, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylAug 01, 2016- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 20, 2014RAD50 has been only recently described in association with cancer predisposition and the risks are not well understood. This variant is denoted RAD50 c.1211A>G at the cDNA level, p.Gln404Arg (Q404R) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Glutamine to an Arginine (CAA>CGA). This variant has not, to our knowledge, been published in the literature as pathogenic or benign. RAD50 Gln404Arg was not observed at a significant allele frequency in 1000 Genomes, and was not observed in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, indicating it is not a common benign variant in these populations. This variant is a semi-conservative substitution in which a neutral polar amino acid is replaced with a positive polar one, altering a position that is moderately conserved throughout evolution and is located within a potential coiled coil region (UniProt). In silico analyses predict this variant to have a benign effect on protein structure and function. On a molecular level, the impact of this missense variant on protein structure and function is not known and thus we consider this to be a variant of uncertain significance. Furthermore, based on the currently available information, cancer risks associated with this variant, and the RAD50 gene, remain unclear. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoNov 01, 2022- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeDec 10, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 16, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJan 10, 2020DNA sequence analysis of the RAD50 gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.1211A>G, in exon 8 that results in an amino acid change, p.Gln404Arg. This sequence change does not appear to have been previously described in patients with RAD50-related disorders and has been described in the gnomAD database with a low population frequency of 0.16% in East Asian subpopulation (dbSNP rs200017020). The p.Gln404Arg change affects a moderately conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the RAD50 protein that is known to be functional. The p.Gln404Arg substitution appears to be benign using several in-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL).Due to these contrasting evidences and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Gln404Arg change remains unknown at this time. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchCancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer ResearchMay 01, 2019- -
RAD50-related condition Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 19, 2021This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.12
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.48
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.49
Cadd
Benign
21
Dann
Benign
0.91
Eigen
Benign
-0.17
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.031
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.0088
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.014
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.64
D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.44
T
Polyphen
0.28
.;.;.;B;.
Vest4
0.53
MVP
0.45
ClinPred
0.032
T
GERP RS
4.8
Varity_R
0.059
gMVP
0.35

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200017020; hg19: chr5-131924538; COSMIC: COSV54753913; COSMIC: COSV54753913; API