rs200074974

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_001330078.2(NRXN1):c.1945A>G(p.Ile649Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000654 in 1,613,932 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. I649I) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00061 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00066 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NRXN1
NM_001330078.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.26

Publications

8 publications found

Variant links:

COSMIC-nc: COSV58457384

Genes affected

NRXN1 (HGNC:8008): (neurexin 1) This gene encodes a single-pass type I membrane protein that belongs to the neurexin family. Neurexins are cell-surface receptors that bind neuroligins to form Ca(2+)-dependent neurexin/neuroligin complexes at synapses in the central nervous system. This complex is required for efficient neurotransmission and is involved in the formation of synaptic contacts. Three members of this gene family have been studied in detail and are estimated to generate over 3,000 variants through the use of two alternative promoters (alpha and beta) and extensive alternative splicing in each family member. Recently, a third promoter (gamma) was identified for this gene in the 3' region. Mutations in this gene are associated with Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome-2 and may contribute to susceptibility to schizophrenia. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

NRXN1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

complex neurodevelopmental disorder
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
chromosome 2p16.3 deletion syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
autism
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: G2P
schizophrenia
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

NRXN1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.050750554).

BP6

Variant 2-50538451-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-50538451-T-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 167387.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000611 (93/152270) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00128 (87/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00106. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 40 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NRXN1	NM_001330078.2 link	c.1945A>G	p.Ile649Val	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 23	ENST00000401669.7	NP_001317007.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NRXN1	ENST00000401669.7 link	c.1945A>G	p.Ile649Val	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 23	5	NM_001330078.2	ENSP00000385017.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000611

AC:

AN:

152152

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000483

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000189

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00128

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000493

AC:

123

AN:

249668

AF XY:

0.000480

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000868

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000995

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000139

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00103

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000658

AC:

962

AN:

1461662

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000652

AC XY:

474

AN XY:

727112

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33476

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000671

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000115

AC:

AN:

26132

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000225

AC:

AN:

53400

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000347

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000801

AC:

891

AN:

1111836

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000845

AC:

AN:

60372

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.492

Heterozygous variant carriers

122

184

245

306

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

112

140

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000611

AC:

AN:

152270

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000537

AC XY:

AN XY:

74442

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000481

AC:

AN:

41560

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

15292

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5164

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000189

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00128

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.495

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00124

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000404

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000698

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000642

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000818

EpiControl

AF:

0.00101

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2Benign:3

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 01, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 16, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome 2

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Apr 08, 2018

Baylor Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Dec 16, 2014

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 16, 2025

Laboratory of Genetics, Children's Clinical University Hospital Latvia

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

NRXN1-related disorder

Uncertain:1

Feb 21, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

The NRXN1 c.2065A>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Ile689Val. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.12% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD, which is likely too common to be an unreported cause of disease. Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Sep 22, 2021

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.091

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.34

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.27

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.062

.;T;.;.;T;.;.;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.050

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.14

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.95

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.96

D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.013

MetaRNN

Benign

0.051

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.60

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.1

.;L;.;.;.;.;.;.

PhyloP100

6.3

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.74

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.64

.;N;N;N;.;.;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.28

Sift

Benign

0.087

.;T;T;T;.;.;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.13

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.20

.;.;B;.;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.49

MVP

0.20

MPC

0.25

ClinPred

0.085

GERP RS

5.2

Varity_R

0.12

gMVP

0.35

Mutation Taster

=88/12

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over