rs200078918
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_005937.4(MLLT6):c.863C>A(p.Thr288Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000031 in 1,613,968 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T288M) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005937.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLLT6 | ENST00000621332.5 | c.863C>A | p.Thr288Lys | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 20 | 1 | NM_005937.4 | ENSP00000479910.1 | ||
MLLT6 | ENST00000620482.4 | n.876C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 9 of 9 | 1 | |||||
MLLT6 | ENST00000618652.1 | n.602C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 5 of 5 | 3 | |||||
ENSG00000275665 | ENST00000620144.1 | n.455G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 4 of 5 | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251196 AF XY: 0.0000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1461680Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727152 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152288Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74474 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at