rs200091822
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2
The ENST00000389817.8(ABCC8):c.-8G>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00437 in 1,545,004 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0026 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0046 ( 22 hom. )
Consequence
ABCC8
ENST00000389817.8 5_prime_UTR
ENST00000389817.8 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.65
Genes affected
ABCC8 (HGNC:59): (ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 8) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC proteins transport various molecules across extra- and intra-cellular membranes. ABC genes are divided into seven distinct subfamilies (ABC1, MDR/TAP, MRP, ALD, OABP, GCN20, White). This protein is a member of the MRP subfamily which is involved in multi-drug resistance. This protein functions as a modulator of ATP-sensitive potassium channels and insulin release. Mutations in the ABCC8 gene and deficiencies in the encoded protein have been observed in patients with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy, an autosomal recessive disorder of unregulated and high insulin secretion. Mutations have also been associated with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type II, an autosomal dominant disease of defective insulin secretion. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.22).
BP6
Variant 11-17476784-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-17476784-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 255928.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=2, Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=3}.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 22 SD gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCC8 | NM_000352.6 | c.-8G>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/39 | ENST00000389817.8 | NP_000343.2 | ||
LOC124902641 | XR_007062609.1 | n.81+53C>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCC8 | ENST00000389817.8 | c.-8G>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/39 | 1 | NM_000352.6 | ENSP00000374467 | P4 | ||
ENST00000662030.1 | n.137+53C>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00264 AC: 402AN: 152012Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
402
AN:
152012
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00258 AC: 378AN: 146580Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00279 AC XY: 221AN XY: 79290
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
378
AN:
146580
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
221
AN XY:
79290
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00455 AC: 6341AN: 1392884Hom.: 22 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00439 AC XY: 3019AN XY: 687810
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
6341
AN:
1392884
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
3019
AN XY:
687810
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00265 AC: 403AN: 152120Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00253 AC XY: 188AN XY: 74344
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
403
AN:
152120
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
188
AN XY:
74344
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 12, 2021 | Variant summary: ABCC8 c.-8G>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide located in the untranslated mRNA region upstream of the initiation codon. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0026 in 290940 control chromosomes, including 3 homozygotes (gnomAD v2.1 and gnomAD v3.1 datasets). The variant was found predominantly within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0046. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.4 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ABCC8 causing Familial Hyperinsulinism phenotype (0.0034), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.-8G>T has been reported in the literature in heterozygous state in individuals affected with neonatal diabetes, congenital hyperinsulinism and adult type 2 diabetes (Proks_2006, Banerjee_2011, Carreira_2021), however, in the reported neonatal/congenital cases, unaffected parents were also noted to carry the variant (Proks_2006, Banerjee_2011). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Dec 11, 2015 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 31, 2022 | Identified without a second variant in unrelated patients with congenital hyperinsulinism in published literature; however the variant was inherited from an unaffected parent in all cases (Proks et al., 2006; Banerjee et al., 2011); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 16613899, 33728157, 21378087) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2024 | ABCC8: BS1, BS2 - |
Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, familial, 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Diabetes mellitus, transient neonatal, 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at