rs200121712
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_004614.5(TK2):c.94C>T(p.Arg32Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00703 in 1,461,434 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 54 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R32Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004614.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TK2 | NM_004614.5 | c.94C>T | p.Arg32Trp | missense_variant | 1/10 | ENST00000544898.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TK2 | ENST00000544898.6 | c.94C>T | p.Arg32Trp | missense_variant | 1/10 | 1 | NM_004614.5 | P1 | |
ENST00000563151.1 | n.689G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00614 AC: 934AN: 152130Hom.: 4 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00727 AC: 483AN: 66464Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00665 AC XY: 249AN XY: 37464
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00713 AC: 9333AN: 1309196Hom.: 50 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00694 AC XY: 4467AN XY: 643454
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00614 AC: 934AN: 152238Hom.: 4 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00666 AC XY: 496AN XY: 74436
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Apr 30, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Feb 23, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2024 | ENSG00000261519: BS2; TK2: BS2 - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 12, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 07, 2017 | - - |
TK2-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 02, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome, myopathic form Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at