rs200140363
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM2PP5_ModerateBP4
The NM_001006657.2(WDR35):c.1415G>A(p.Arg472Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000867 in 1,614,074 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000062 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
WDR35
NM_001006657.2 missense
NM_001006657.2 missense
Scores
1
6
10
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.96
Genes affected
WDR35 (HGNC:29250): (WD repeat domain 35) This gene encodes a member of the WD repeat protein family. WD repeats are minimally conserved regions of approximately 40 amino acids typically bracketed by gly-his and trp-asp (GH-WD), which may facilitate formation of heterotrimeric or multiprotein complexes. Members of this family are involved in a variety of cellular processes, including cell cycle progression, signal transduction, apoptosis, and gene regulation. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been found for this gene. Two patients with Sensenbrenner syndrome / cranioectodermal dysplasia (CED) were identified with mutations in this gene, consistent with a possible ciliary function.[provided by RefSeq, Sep 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
PM2
?
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP5
?
Variant 2-19953852-C-T is Pathogenic according to our data. Variant chr2-19953852-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_pathogenic]. Clinvar id is 437865.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.26001137).. Strength limited to SUPPORTING due to the PP5.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDR35 | NM_001006657.2 | c.1415G>A | p.Arg472Gln | missense_variant | 13/28 | ENST00000345530.8 | |
WDR35 | NM_020779.4 | c.1382G>A | p.Arg461Gln | missense_variant | 12/27 | ENST00000281405.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDR35 | ENST00000345530.8 | c.1415G>A | p.Arg472Gln | missense_variant | 13/28 | 1 | NM_001006657.2 | A1 | |
WDR35 | ENST00000281405.9 | c.1382G>A | p.Arg461Gln | missense_variant | 12/27 | 1 | NM_020779.4 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
152156
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000318 AC: 8AN: 251424Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135888
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
251424
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135888
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000616 AC: 9AN: 1461800Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727184
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
1461800
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
727184
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000328 AC: 5AN: 152274Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74458
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
152274
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74458
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
5
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely pathogenic
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Cranioectodermal dysplasia 2 Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Laboratorio de Citogenómica y Microarreglos, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon | Aug 27, 2017 | WDR35 participates in the retrograde IFT associated to cell cilium assembly and maintenance mainly through formation (along with IFT43) of the IFT-A complex. Although homozygous and compound heterozygous mutations in this gene usually lead to heterogenous clinical features, they have also been related to the distinct CED2 (OMIM 613610) and SRTD7 (OMIM 614091) syndromes. CED2 main features are craniosynostosis, dolichocephaly, narrow rib cage, short limbs, brachydactyly, and ectodermal defects (e.g., sparse hair, and nail and dental anomalies) whereas SRTD7 includes constricted thoracic cage, short ribs, and shortened tubular bones. Most patients with any of these syndromes appear to show normal intelligence and have no brain anomalies; however, two patients with developmental delay -- one featuring cortical atrophy, lobe defects, and ventriculomegaly and the other mega cisterna magna and slight cortical atrophy -- have been reported. Next generation sequencing: We focused on homozygous variants with a population frequency <0.01% and predicted to be pathogenic, likely pathogenic or variant of uncertain significance (VUS) by the SIFT, PANTHER, Mutation Taster 2, PhD-SNP, PROVEAN, and PolyPhen-2 platforms. Sequence conservation was evaluated by PhyloP, PhastCons and GERP scores; while MuPro and CFSSP from ExPASy were used to predict changes in the protein secondary structure. Results: The WDR35 mutation c.1415G>A also was a homozygous missense variant resulting in p.Arg472Gln. The total read depth for this variant was 62x (GQX= 99). This variant has not yet been reported in NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) or ClinVar databases; but ExAC browser reported five alleles (5/121400, 0.00004119) with the same but heterozygous variant. This change is predicted to be likely pathogenic by Polyphen-2, PANTHER and Mutation tasting 2, whereas analysis by PROVEAN, SIFT and PhD-SNP considered this substitution to be neutral. Conservation scores (PhastCons = 1, PhyloP = 4.78, and GERP = 5.65) indicate that this position is evolutionary conserved. Accordingly, CFSSP tool denoted introduction of a new α-helix into the putative protein β-propeller domain 2 predicting stability decreasing from such missense variant. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Uncertain
Dann
Pathogenic
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T
Polyphen
D;P;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.59
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at