Menu
GeneBe

rs200161607

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.1224G>A(p.Ala408=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000694 in 1,614,156 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A408A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000071 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: -5.03
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
BP6
Variant 16-68813399-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68813399-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 136057.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-68813399-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr16-68813399-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.03 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 8 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1224G>A p.Ala408= synonymous_variant 9/16 ENST00000261769.10
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-392G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 9/16
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-596G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 9/15
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1137+1136G>A intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1224G>A p.Ala408= synonymous_variant 9/161 NM_004360.5 P1P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152164
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000795
AC:
20
AN:
251482
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000103
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
135914
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000867
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000711
AC:
104
AN:
1461874
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000770
AC XY:
56
AN XY:
727238
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000896
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000112
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000809
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000497
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000525
AC:
8
AN:
152282
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000806
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.0000494
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000642
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:17
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesFeb 27, 2020- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoOct 09, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenFeb 01, 2024CDH1: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEuropean Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of PortoAug 01, 2022BS2_Supporting; BS3 (PMID: 30311375) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylDec 04, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 07, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 06, 2023This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 13, 2018Variant summary: CDH1 c.1224G>A alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. A functional study confirmed the lack of impact on splicing (Chen_2013). The variant allele was found at a frequency of 7.6e-05 in 277224 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 2.68 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer phenotype (2.8e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.1224G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with gastric cancer and breast cancer (Chen_2013, Stuebs_2018). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Mar 22, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 21, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMay 12, 2016- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMay 03, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.78
Cadd
Benign
0.17
Dann
Benign
0.81

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200161607; hg19: chr16-68847302; API