rs200180652
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_000642.3(AGL):c.767G>A(p.Arg256His) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000756 in 1,613,988 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R256C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000642.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGL | NM_000642.3 | c.767G>A | p.Arg256His | missense_variant | 6/34 | ENST00000361915.8 | NP_000633.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGL | ENST00000361915.8 | c.767G>A | p.Arg256His | missense_variant | 6/34 | 1 | NM_000642.3 | ENSP00000355106.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000592 AC: 9AN: 152110Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000438 AC: 11AN: 251310Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000663 AC XY: 9AN XY: 135822
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000773 AC: 113AN: 1461760Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000798 AC XY: 58AN XY: 727192
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000591 AC: 9AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000806 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74410
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Glycogen storage disease type III Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Sep 01, 2022 | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with histidine, which is basic and polar, at codon 256 of the AGL protein (p.Arg256His). This variant is present in population databases (rs200180652, gnomAD 0.009%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with AGL-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 439395). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The histidine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Jul 14, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Aug 17, 2020 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Dec 21, 2016 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 03, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at