rs200211587
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_025114.4(CEP290):āc.1298A>Gā(p.Asp433Gly) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00142 in 1,613,582 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.0014 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
CEP290
NM_025114.4 missense
NM_025114.4 missense
Scores
1
12
6
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 6.93
Genes affected
CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.015875965).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEP290 | NM_025114.4 | c.1298A>G | p.Asp433Gly | missense_variant | 14/54 | ENST00000552810.6 | NP_079390.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEP290 | ENST00000552810.6 | c.1298A>G | p.Asp433Gly | missense_variant | 14/54 | 1 | NM_025114.4 | ENSP00000448012 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00136 AC: 207AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
207
AN:
152196
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00131 AC: 326AN: 248922Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00135 AC XY: 183AN XY: 135062
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
326
AN:
248922
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
183
AN XY:
135062
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00142 AC: 2077AN: 1461268Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00138 AC XY: 1001AN XY: 726926
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
2077
AN:
1461268
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1001
AN XY:
726926
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00136 AC: 207AN: 152314Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00124 AC XY: 92AN XY: 74476
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
207
AN:
152314
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
92
AN XY:
74476
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
5
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
7
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
17
ExAC
AF:
AC:
169
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Sep 10, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jan 11, 2022 | Variant summary: CEP290 c.1298A>G (p.Asp433Gly) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0013 in 248922 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 1.2 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CEP290 causing Meckel Syndrome Type 4 phenotype (0.0011), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.1298A>G has been reported in the literature in settings of multigene panel testing among individuals with retinal dystrophies/retinitis pigmentosa (example, Eisenberger_2013, Costa_2017, Testa_2021). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Meckel Syndrome Type 4. At-least one co-occurrence with another heterozygous pathogenic variant has been reported in an individual with a probably positive diagnosis of Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa (ROM1 c.671C>T, p.Pro224Leu). As this CEP290 variant was reported in a heterozygous state, it does not conclusively support a benign outcome, however, the authors listed this variant among other non pathogenic variation reported in this individual (Costa_2017). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (likely benign, n=2;VUS,n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Meckel syndrome, type 4 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | MGZ Medical Genetics Center | Oct 18, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2023 | CEP290: BP4 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 22, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24265693, 28912962) - |
Senior-Loken syndrome 6 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Leber congenital amaurosis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Jan 27, 2020 | - - |
Leber congenital amaurosis 10 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Joubert syndrome 5 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis;C0687120:Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
.;D;T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
.;M;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D;.;.
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T;T;.;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;T;T
Polyphen
0.96
.;D;.;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.36
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at