rs200226170
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_016301.4(GPN3):c.826G>T(p.Glu276*) variant causes a stop gained change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000754 in 1,326,304 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016301.4 stop_gained
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_016301.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPN3 | MANE Select | c.826G>T | p.Glu276* | stop_gained | Exon 8 of 8 | NP_057385.3 | |||
| GPN3 | c.943G>T | p.Glu315* | stop_gained | Exon 8 of 8 | NP_001157844.1 | Q9UHW5-3 | |||
| GPN3 | c.856G>T | p.Glu286* | stop_gained | Exon 8 of 8 | NP_001157845.1 | Q9UHW5-2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPN3 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.826G>T | p.Glu276* | stop_gained | Exon 8 of 8 | ENSP00000228827.3 | Q9UHW5-1 | ||
| GPN3 | TSL:1 | c.856G>T | p.Glu286* | stop_gained | Exon 8 of 8 | ENSP00000443068.2 | Q9UHW5-2 | ||
| GPN3 | TSL:5 | c.943G>T | p.Glu315* | stop_gained | Exon 8 of 8 | ENSP00000442770.1 | Q9UHW5-3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 7.54e-7 AC: 1AN: 1326304Hom.: 0 Cov.: 21 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 666780 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at