rs200239821
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM5BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_006208.3(ENPP1):c.2336C>A(p.Thr779Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00053 in 1,614,032 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T779P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006208.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENPP1 | ENST00000647893.1 | c.2336C>A | p.Thr779Asn | missense_variant | Exon 23 of 25 | NM_006208.3 | ENSP00000498074.1 | |||
ENPP1 | ENST00000513998.5 | n.*1173C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 23 of 25 | 5 | ENSP00000422424.1 | ||||
ENPP1 | ENST00000684674.1 | n.767C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 4 of 6 | ||||||
ENPP1 | ENST00000513998.5 | n.*1173C>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 23 of 25 | 5 | ENSP00000422424.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000348 AC: 53AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000967 AC: 243AN: 251406Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00121 AC XY: 165AN XY: 135886
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000548 AC: 801AN: 1461736Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000721 AC XY: 524AN XY: 727184
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000355 AC: 54AN: 152296Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000457 AC XY: 34AN XY: 74466
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
- -
Type 2 diabetes mellitus;C2750078:Hypophosphatemic rickets, autosomal recessive, 2;C3809781:Hypopigmentation-punctate palmoplantar keratoderma syndrome;C4054476:Inherited obesity;C4551985:Arterial calcification, generalized, of infancy, 1 Benign:1
- -
Arterial calcification, generalized, of infancy, 1 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Hypophosphatemic rickets, autosomal recessive, 2 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
- -
ENPP1-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at