rs200251444
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_001164508.2(NEB):c.6088C>T(p.Leu2030Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00011 in 1,596,174 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164508.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | c.6088C>T | p.Leu2030Phe | missense_variant | Exon 48 of 182 | 5 | NM_001164508.2 | ENSP00000380505.3 | ||
NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | c.6088C>T | p.Leu2030Phe | missense_variant | Exon 48 of 182 | 5 | NM_001164507.2 | ENSP00000416578.2 | ||
NEB | ENST00000409198.5 | c.6088C>T | p.Leu2030Phe | missense_variant | Exon 48 of 150 | 5 | ENSP00000386259.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000545 AC: 83AN: 152164Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000128 AC: 30AN: 233848Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000103 AC XY: 13AN XY: 126380
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000651 AC: 94AN: 1443892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0000599 AC XY: 43AN XY: 718062
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000538 AC: 82AN: 152282Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000470 AC XY: 35AN XY: 74450
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:1
In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
- -
- -
The NEB p.Leu2030Phe variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic, MutDB or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs200251444) and in ClinVar with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity (classified as likely benign by Invitae and uncertain significance by EGL Genetic diagnostics). The variant is associated with Nemaline myopathy 2. The variant was identified in control databases in 45 of 265236 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00017 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 40 of 23168 chromosomes (freq: 0.001727), Latino in 5 of 33694 chromosomes (freq: 0.000148), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), European (non-Finnish), Other, and South Asian populations. The p.Leu2030 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The c.6088C>T (p.L2030F) alteration is located in exon 48 (coding exon 46) of the NEB gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 6088, causing the leucine (L) at amino acid position 2030 to be replaced by a phenylalanine (F). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
NEB-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Nemaline myopathy 2 Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at