Menu
GeneBe

rs200276861

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The ENST00000393994.4(BBS1):c.1318G>A(p.Ala440Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00161 in 1,613,982 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 42 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/13 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 37 hom. )

Consequence

BBS1
ENST00000393994.4 missense

Scores

14

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.692
Variant links:
Genes affected
BBS1 (HGNC:966): (Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1) Mutations in this gene have been observed in patients with the major form (type 1) of Bardet-Biedl syndrome. The encoded protein may play a role in eye, limb, cardiac and reproductive system development. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
ZDHHC24 (HGNC:27387): (zinc finger DHHC-type containing 24) Predicted to enable protein-cysteine S-palmitoyltransferase activity. Predicted to be involved in peptidyl-L-cysteine S-palmitoylation and protein targeting to membrane. Predicted to be integral component of membrane. Predicted to be active in Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 0 benign, 4 uncertain in ENST00000393994.4
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0032209754).
BP6
Variant 11-66531752-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-66531752-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 305471.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-66531752-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr11-66531752-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0012 (183/152106) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0299 (144/4812). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0259. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 121 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BBS1NM_024649.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1695+10G>A intron_variant ENST00000318312.12

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BBS1ENST00000318312.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.1695+10G>A intron_variant 1 NM_024649.5 P1Q8NFJ9-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00120
AC:
183
AN:
151988
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000798
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0297
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000883
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00350
AC:
879
AN:
251484
Hom.:
11
AF XY:
0.00447
AC XY:
607
AN XY:
135918
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000800
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0276
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000105
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00130
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00165
AC:
2410
AN:
1461876
Hom.:
37
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00236
AC XY:
1718
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000508
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0253
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000374
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000827
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00185
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00120
AC:
183
AN:
152106
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00163
AC XY:
121
AN XY:
74350
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000771
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0299
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000883
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000297
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000400
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000682
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00379
AC:
460
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00924
AC:
32
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoAug 25, 2017- -
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Bardet-Biedl syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 30, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.50
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.47
Cadd
Benign
1.2
Dann
Benign
0.54
Eigen
Benign
-1.8
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.9
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.017
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.34
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0032
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.35
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.29
N
REVEL
Benign
0.20
Sift
Benign
0.61
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.31
T
Vest4
0.084
MVP
0.076
ClinPred
0.00041
T
GERP RS
-4.1
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200276861; hg19: chr11-66299223; API