rs200294578
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2
The NM_002047.4(GARS1):āc.253A>Gā(p.Lys85Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000358 in 1,614,068 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.00028 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.00037 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
GARS1
NM_002047.4 missense
NM_002047.4 missense
Scores
5
13
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.78
Genes affected
GARS1 (HGNC:4162): (glycyl-tRNA synthetase 1) This gene encodes glycyl-tRNA synthetase, one of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases that charge tRNAs with their cognate amino acids. The encoded enzyme is an (alpha)2 dimer which belongs to the class II family of tRNA synthetases. It has been shown to be a target of autoantibodies in the human autoimmune diseases, polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.12623665).
BP6
Variant 7-30598826-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-30598826-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 422016.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000282 (43/152220) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000573 (39/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000431. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 22 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 43 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARS1 | NM_002047.4 | c.253A>G | p.Lys85Glu | missense_variant | 2/17 | ENST00000389266.8 | NP_002038.2 | |
GARS1 | NM_001316772.1 | c.91A>G | p.Lys31Glu | missense_variant | 2/17 | NP_001303701.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARS1 | ENST00000389266.8 | c.253A>G | p.Lys85Glu | missense_variant | 2/17 | 1 | NM_002047.4 | ENSP00000373918 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000282 AC: 43AN: 152220Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
43
AN:
152220
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000265 AC: 66AN: 249520Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000259 AC XY: 35AN XY: 135390
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
66
AN:
249520
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
35
AN XY:
135390
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000366 AC: 535AN: 1461848Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000356 AC XY: 259AN XY: 727228
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
535
AN:
1461848
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
259
AN XY:
727228
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000282 AC: 43AN: 152220Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000296 AC XY: 22AN XY: 74382
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
43
AN:
152220
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
22
AN XY:
74382
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
4
ExAC
AF:
AC:
29
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Aug 05, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 10, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28492532, 28166811) - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Sep 23, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 28, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Distal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T
M_CAP
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationTaster
Benign
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
D
Sift4G
Benign
T
Polyphen
B
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at