rs200313391

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):​c.6214G>A​(p.Val2072Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00033 in 1,583,600 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00019 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.265
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.00454244).
BP6
Variant 11-77211314-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77211314-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43322.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr11-77211314-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00166 (253/152284) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0059 (245/41556). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00529. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 124 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.6214G>A p.Val2072Ile missense_variant 45/49 ENST00000409709.9 NP_000251.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.6214G>A p.Val2072Ile missense_variant 45/491 NM_000260.4 ENSP00000386331 Q13402-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00166
AC:
253
AN:
152166
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00591
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000347
AC:
69
AN:
199134
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000261
AC XY:
28
AN XY:
107234
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00575
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000172
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000188
AC:
269
AN:
1431316
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000164
AC XY:
116
AN XY:
708970
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00703
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000125
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000182
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000523
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00166
AC:
253
AN:
152284
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00167
AC XY:
124
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00590
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.000204
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00203
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00549
AC:
22
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000425
AC:
51

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 04, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsApr 11, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 30, 2024- -
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 05, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineNov 27, 2017Val2072Ile in exon 45 of MYO7A: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 0.5% (114/19526) of African chromos omes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.or g; dbSNP rs200313391). -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Usher syndrome type 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.062
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.52
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
CADD
Benign
9.3
DANN
Benign
0.80
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.23
T;.;.;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.21
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.84
T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.032
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0045
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.81
L;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.76
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.22
N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.22
Sift
Benign
0.23
T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.20
T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;.;.;.
Vest4
0.13
MVP
0.45
MPC
0.069
ClinPred
0.0039
T
GERP RS
-6.8
Varity_R
0.10
gMVP
0.070

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200313391; hg19: chr11-76922359; API