rs200345478
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000503.6(EYA1):c.1199+13G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000175 in 1,612,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00090 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000099 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
EYA1
NM_000503.6 intron
NM_000503.6 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.732
Genes affected
EYA1 (HGNC:3519): (EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 1) This gene encodes a member of the eyes absent (EYA) family of proteins. The encoded protein may play a role in the developing kidney, branchial arches, eye, and ear. Mutations of this gene have been associated with branchiootorenal dysplasia syndrome, branchiootic syndrome, and sporadic cases of congenital cataracts and ocular anterior segment anomalies. A similar protein in mice can act as a transcriptional activator. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 8-71216952-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-71216952-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 163432.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-71216952-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0009 (137/152304) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00315 (131/41578). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00271. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 60 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 137 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EYA1 | NM_000503.6 | c.1199+13G>T | intron_variant | ENST00000340726.8 | NP_000494.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EYA1 | ENST00000340726.8 | c.1199+13G>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_000503.6 | ENSP00000342626 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000900 AC: 137AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
137
AN:
152186
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000271 AC: 68AN: 251204Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000192 AC XY: 26AN XY: 135764
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
68
AN:
251204
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
135764
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000993 AC: 145AN: 1460676Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000771 AC XY: 56AN XY: 726722
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
145
AN:
1460676
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
56
AN XY:
726722
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000900 AC: 137AN: 152304Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000806 AC XY: 60AN XY: 74484
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
137
AN:
152304
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
60
AN XY:
74484
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Branchiootic syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 30, 2012 | 1199+13G>T in Intron 12 of EYA1: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus sequ ence and has been identified in 0.3% (12/3738) of African American chromosomes f rom a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.wash ington.edu/EVS). - |
Melnick-Fraser syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 13, 2023 | - - |
Otofaciocervical syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at