Menu
GeneBe

rs200510462

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_020366.4(RPGRIP1):c.95T>A(p.Met32Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00208 in 1,613,328 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M32V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 0 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0022 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

RPGRIP1
NM_020366.4 missense

Scores

3
15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.184
Variant links:
Genes affected
RPGRIP1 (HGNC:13436): (RPGR interacting protein 1) This gene encodes a photoreceptor protein that interacts with retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator protein and is a key component of cone and rod photoreceptor cells. Mutations in this gene lead to autosomal recessive congenital blindness. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009699613).
BP6
Variant 14-21294686-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-21294686-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 195356.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=5, Likely_benign=4}. Variant chr14-21294686-T-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr14-21294686-T-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00137 (208/152208) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0025 (170/68010). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00219. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 84 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RPGRIP1NM_020366.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.95T>A p.Met32Lys missense_variant 3/25 ENST00000400017.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RPGRIP1ENST00000400017.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.95T>A p.Met32Lys missense_variant 3/251 NM_020366.4 P2Q96KN7-1
RPGRIP1ENST00000557771.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.95T>A p.Met32Lys missense_variant 2/245 A2
RPGRIP1ENST00000556336.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.95T>A p.Met32Lys missense_variant 2/215

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00137
AC:
208
AN:
152090
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000985
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000620
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00250
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00128
AC:
319
AN:
248600
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00125
AC XY:
168
AN XY:
134900
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000646
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000204
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000790
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000325
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00238
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000331
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00216
AC:
3152
AN:
1461120
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00210
AC XY:
1523
AN XY:
726886
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000359
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000157
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000789
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000487
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00268
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00101
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00137
AC:
208
AN:
152208
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00113
AC XY:
84
AN XY:
74428
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000984
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00250
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.00210
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00133
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00243
AC:
9
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00259
AC:
10
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00134
AC:
5
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00281
AC:
23
ExAC
AF:
0.00159
AC:
192
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00218
EpiControl
AF:
0.00225

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Oct 03, 2014- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJan 06, 2020- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJan 01, 2024RPGRIP1: BP4, BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Leber congenital amaurosis 6;C2750720:Cone-rod dystrophy 13 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
Cone-rod dystrophy 13 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabNov 07, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Leber congenital amaurosis 6 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabNov 07, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.096
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.40
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.35
Cadd
Benign
15
Dann
Benign
0.91
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.075
T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.76
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.81
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.14
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.58
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.046
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0097
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.84
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.6
D;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.14
Sift
Uncertain
0.020
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.015
D;D;D
Polyphen
0.17
.;.;B
Vest4
0.44
MVP
0.63
MPC
0.11
ClinPred
0.011
T
GERP RS
-0.55
Varity_R
0.41
gMVP
0.25

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200510462; hg19: chr14-21762845; API