rs200547781
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_002382.5(MAX):c.56A>T(p.Gln19Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000298 in 1,610,270 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000040 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000029 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MAX
NM_002382.5 missense
NM_002382.5 missense
Scores
2
6
11
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.10
Genes affected
MAX (HGNC:6913): (MYC associated factor X) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper (bHLHZ) family of transcription factors. It is able to form homodimers and heterodimers with other family members, which include Mad, Mxi1 and Myc. Myc is an oncoprotein implicated in cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. The homodimers and heterodimers compete for a common DNA target site (the E box) and rearrangement among these dimer forms provides a complex system of transcriptional regulation. Mutations of this gene have been reported to be associated with hereditary pheochromocytoma. A pseudogene of this gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 7. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
PM1
In a chain Protein max (size 158) in uniprot entity MAX_HUMAN there are 10 pathogenic changes around while only 0 benign (100%) in NM_002382.5
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.046061754).
BP6
Variant 14-65101553-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-65101553-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 404106.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=5, Benign=1}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 6 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAX | NM_002382.5 | c.56A>T | p.Gln19Leu | missense_variant | 2/5 | ENST00000358664.9 | NP_002373.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAX | ENST00000358664.9 | c.56A>T | p.Gln19Leu | missense_variant | 2/5 | 1 | NM_002382.5 | ENSP00000351490.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 151760Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
151760
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000883 AC: 22AN: 249258Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000964 AC XY: 13AN XY: 134906
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
22
AN:
249258
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
134906
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000288 AC: 42AN: 1458510Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000289 AC XY: 21AN XY: 725720
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
42
AN:
1458510
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
21
AN XY:
725720
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 151760Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74128
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
151760
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74128
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
8
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Pheochromocytoma Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Oct 06, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 23, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jan 14, 2022 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 26, 2022 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
MAX-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 19, 2023 | The MAX c.56A>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Gln19Leu. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.21% of alleles in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/14-65568271-T-A). It is interpreted as uncertain in ClinVar by the vast majority of clinical submitters (https://preview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/404106/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | This sequence change replaces glutamine, which is neutral and polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 19 of the MAX protein (p.Gln19Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs200547781, gnomAD 0.2%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with MAX-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 404106). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 27, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;.;.;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;.;T;T;T;.;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;L;L;L;.;L;L
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;.;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T;.;T;T;D;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T;T;D;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
.;B;.;B;.;B;.
Vest4
MutPred
Loss of methylation at K24 (P = 0.0476);Loss of methylation at K24 (P = 0.0476);Loss of methylation at K24 (P = 0.0476);Loss of methylation at K24 (P = 0.0476);Loss of methylation at K24 (P = 0.0476);Loss of methylation at K24 (P = 0.0476);Loss of methylation at K24 (P = 0.0476);
MVP
MPC
0.96
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at