rs200574441
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_018076.5(ODAD2):c.86C>T(p.Ala29Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000229 in 1,613,014 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018076.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- primary ciliary dyskinesia 23Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- primary ciliary dyskinesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_018076.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODAD2 | NM_018076.5 | MANE Select | c.86C>T | p.Ala29Val | missense | Exon 2 of 20 | NP_060546.2 | ||
| ODAD2 | NM_001290020.2 | c.86C>T | p.Ala29Val | missense | Exon 2 of 20 | NP_001276949.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODAD2 | ENST00000305242.10 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.86C>T | p.Ala29Val | missense | Exon 2 of 20 | ENSP00000306410.5 | ||
| ODAD2 | ENST00000673439.1 | c.86C>T | p.Ala29Val | missense | Exon 2 of 20 | ENSP00000500782.1 | |||
| ODAD2 | ENST00000486279.2 | TSL:5 | c.86C>T | p.Ala29Val | missense | Exon 3 of 4 | ENSP00000473438.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000191 AC: 29AN: 151798Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000444 AC: 111AN: 250130 AF XY: 0.000570 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000234 AC: 342AN: 1461098Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000308 AC XY: 224AN XY: 726770 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000184 AC: 28AN: 151916Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000323 AC XY: 24AN XY: 74236 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 23 Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 29 of the ARMC4 protein (p.Ala29Val). The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with ARMC4-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 474592). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The valine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at