rs200575795
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_201384.3(PLEC):c.5476C>T(p.Arg1826Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00436 in 1,554,648 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 45 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1826Q) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_201384.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLEC | NM_201384.3 | c.5476C>T | p.Arg1826Trp | missense_variant | 31/32 | ENST00000345136.8 | NP_958786.1 | |
PLEC | NM_201378.4 | c.5434C>T | p.Arg1812Trp | missense_variant | 31/32 | ENST00000356346.7 | NP_958780.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLEC | ENST00000345136.8 | c.5476C>T | p.Arg1826Trp | missense_variant | 31/32 | 1 | NM_201384.3 | ENSP00000344848.3 | ||
PLEC | ENST00000356346.7 | c.5434C>T | p.Arg1812Trp | missense_variant | 31/32 | 1 | NM_201378.4 | ENSP00000348702.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00367 AC: 556AN: 151596Hom.: 5 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00657 AC: 1089AN: 165826Hom.: 12 AF XY: 0.00711 AC XY: 664AN XY: 93448
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00443 AC: 6221AN: 1402942Hom.: 40 Cov.: 68 AF XY: 0.00482 AC XY: 3352AN XY: 695662
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00366 AC: 556AN: 151706Hom.: 5 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00360 AC XY: 267AN XY: 74168
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Sep 12, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2024 | PLEC: BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 01, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 10, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 13, 2020 | - - |
Epidermolysis bullosa simplex, Ogna type;C2677349:Epidermolysis bullosa simplex 5C, with pyloric atresia;C2931072:Epidermolysis bullosa simplex 5B, with muscular dystrophy;C3150989:Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2Q;C4225309:Epidermolysis bullosa simplex with nail dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 26, 2024 | - - |
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Baylor-Hopkins Center for Mendelian Genomics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at